Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 10 best and worst things about windows XP
informationweek.com ^ | 11/19/01 | Fred Langa

Posted on 11/19/2001 1:10:08 PM PST by damnlimey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2001 1:10:08 PM PST by damnlimey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
Staying a while with Win2K. Finally have good drivers for everything.
2 posted on 11/19/2001 1:18:56 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
Cleartype will change your life. LCD displays without Cleartype look damaged by comparison. My daughter loves the ease of burning CDs (and there is tons of perfectly legal-to-download music on MP3.com from garage bands, never-quite-made-it classical artists, promos, and out-of-print stuff record companies dump on MP3.com just to get a little click-through revenue).
3 posted on 11/19/2001 1:20:19 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Agree. Always, always, always, wait for the first service pack!!!
4 posted on 11/19/2001 1:21:39 PM PST by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
always, wait for the first service pack!!!

In the case of Win2K, sp2 solved a lot of annoying problems, especially with drivers and Plug 'n Pray.

5 posted on 11/19/2001 1:28:20 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
I'm also ambivalent about XP's default color scheme: It's initially fresh and nice, but after a long day of staring at the screen, I find the colors increasingly garish and carnivallike.

Carnival like? More Fisher-Price like to me. The default color scheme is AWFUL. It reminds me of the buttons on my 3 year old's toys.

I converted from Win2K Professional a few weeks back, and other than the default color scheme, I can't find a whole lot about it I don't like. Startup/Shutdown is much faster, the wife and I can switch logons effortlessly and save what we were working on, in the state it was in when we do it, and I had no problems getting it running on my home network.

Don't know what the author's problem was with home networking, but overall a pretty well (and accurate) written article for the masses.

6 posted on 11/19/2001 1:29:16 PM PST by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
I would assume that if you buy CD burner hardware, you get driver software with it. So now you get, free of charge, something that you already got free of charge.

Sometimes you wonder how much money Bill Gates would have made if he had become a lawyer . . . .

7 posted on 11/19/2001 1:29:55 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump for later reading
8 posted on 11/19/2001 1:32:10 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
My responses to the article:

Built-in CD-R software: It's about time; XP finally does away with the need for third-party tools for basic CD-R burning. You simply drag files to your CD burner's drive letter, and XP caches the files and then burns them to a blank CD-R with good reliability. If you do encounter underrun problems, XP ratchets down the write speed of the next CD-R burn and keeps doing so until you get 100% verified writes. It couldn't be simpler to use.

In the mean time, your CD Writer is temporarily assigned the job of "pretty coaster dispenser".

Indexing: XP's Indexing Service just might be a candidate for the most inefficient piece of software ever written. I've never seen any indexing tool run as slowly or as resource-hungrily as does XP's.

So disable it. It shouldn't be that hard. I mean, you had to manually activate it, correct?

On my primary system here, even with XP-certified video hardware and drivers, I get an unreadable, scrambled screen on resume from hibernation. Working from memory and navigating blindly, if I log off and back on, the screen clears and everything's fine. But this is dangerous and annoying. Clearly, hibernation still has some rough edges. See the next item for a guess as to why this is.

I have the same problem in Win2K. It doesn't bother me, though, since I leave my PC on all the time anyways.

For example, I naturally suspected my hibernation troubles above were video-related, but I was using drivers supplied by Microsoft itself, with all proper certifications and signings. I then visited my video-card vendor's site (Nvidia) and downloaded its "designed for Windows XP" drivers, but things only got worse: Not only would hibernation fail, but even ordinary suspend/resume generated a system error. So, even with all the proper checks, branding, and certification, XP's drivers may still be problematic. This is a situation that probably will improve rapidly with time, but it's a major pain now.

Ahh yes, and did it tell you that the drivers weren't signed? Just because it says "Designed for Windows XP" doesn't mean it's signed.

Another mixed-bag networking item is XP's built-in firewall. It's a great idea on the surface, but it's anemic.

Well duh! Since when do you expect a security solution from Microsoft to actually work?

9 posted on 11/19/2001 1:32:58 PM PST by Winged Elf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
best thing...its not windows 98. worst thing...its not OSX
10 posted on 11/19/2001 1:33:08 PM PST by better_dead_then_red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: better_dead_then_red
Obvious thing: It's not Linux.
11 posted on 11/19/2001 1:35:47 PM PST by Winged Elf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Ditto. Plus I'm still in the process of migrating my network to Win2K. I'll wait until the first or second service pack before I go to WinXP.
12 posted on 11/19/2001 1:36:59 PM PST by Winged Elf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
But networking for workgroups, departments, and small offices--especially in mixed platform, peer-to-peer environments--seems to have fallen though the cracks

Exactly the problem we had that led to us wiping the disk and going back to 98SE.
13 posted on 11/19/2001 1:51:02 PM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winged Elf
"Ahh yes, and did it tell you that the drivers weren't signed? Just because it says "Designed for Windows XP" doesn't mean it's signed":Winged elf

"For example, I naturally suspected my hibernation troubles above were video-related, but I was using drivers supplied by Microsoft itself, with all proper certifications and signings."
So wise but clearly unable to read an article properly
You seem to be a very angry young pixie.

14 posted on 11/19/2001 1:55:03 PM PST by damnlimey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
Guess I'll add my own (ongoing) horror story.

After my box melted down a few weeks ago, I upgraded to a new MB and processor. Part of the deal was I got XP pro software.

My, it sure is fast and the desktop is pretty, but it won't run my printer or my modem!

Talked to the store that sold me the MB with onboard modem, they gave me the latest and greatest driver.

It won't work either.

Either I 1)replace the modem chipset, which is all of two weeks old, or 2)buy cable access, or 3)go back to '98.

Right now option 3 fits my budget, so XP will gather dust on the software shelf for now.

15 posted on 11/19/2001 1:55:44 PM PST by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
Most of the free software that comes with CD burners makes liquid pig manure smell good by comparison. "Easy CD Creator" contains three separate lies in the name alone. It is toxic chemical waste. In XP, it's literally one click in the folder of mp3s. A thing of beauty.
16 posted on 11/19/2001 1:56:17 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
[M]any elements of XP seek to open ports or establish Internet access--or even seek to set themselves up as servers--for what would seem to be entirely local operations.

For me, this is a "deal killer" all by itself. I hate it when processes attempt to access the network without asking. The first time I saw a program doing this was when I was helping a neighbor with his system. We were next to the computer talking when all of a sudden, the modem lights up and AOL is trying to connect. I went to see what it was doing and AOL was downloading new files. What files or why wasn't explained. At that point, I started to see why some of the screwy things he'd seen might be happening on his system. When I bought an HP system for work, I disabled the "phone home" junk it came with. I figured that if the reason for phoning home wasn't important enough to notify me about, then it wasn't important. The last thing I need is Zone Alarm going off every five minutes with another process wanting to use the network. No thanks!

17 posted on 11/19/2001 1:58:15 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
Let me point out a certain phrase which should explain everything:

I then visited my video-card vendor's site (Nvidia) and downloaded its "designed for Windows XP" drivers

Now figuratively, Nvidia's drivers are not supplied by Microsoft, and with the exception of the Detonator 6.50, 12.41, and possibly the 21.81 drivers, they are not signed drivers. If it comes up with a warning upon driver update that the drivers are unsigned, and he glossed over it and installed them anyways, then that's his problem.

18 posted on 11/19/2001 2:02:05 PM PST by Winged Elf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: damnlimey
Let me point out a certain phrase which should explain everything:

I then visited my video-card vendor's site (Nvidia) and downloaded its "designed for Windows XP" drivers

Now figuratively, Nvidia's drivers are not supplied by Microsoft, and with the exception of the Detonator 6.50, 12.41, and possibly the 21.81 drivers, they are not signed drivers. If it comes up with a warning upon driver update that the drivers are unsigned, and he glossed over it and installed them anyways, then that's his problem.

19 posted on 11/19/2001 2:03:08 PM PST by Winged Elf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: *tech_index
indexing
20 posted on 11/19/2001 2:04:46 PM PST by testforecho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson