Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aric2000
"...a criminal, would NOT knowingly walk into a situation where a victim would be armed..."

For fear of their lives? I don't think that the guy whose mission was to crash an airplane into a building was really concerned with his own survival.

182 posted on 11/20/2001 9:22:27 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
Well, if he was shot dead before he got a chance to crash the plane, then he would think twice about boarding that aircraft. If he's dead, he cannot fulfill his mission.

And it is the GUNOWNERS responsiblity to get the proper training, not the governments job to make him get it.

Owning a firearm and carrying it are rights, and therefore you are allowed to own one whether you are trained or not.
185 posted on 11/20/2001 9:36:02 AM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
"For fear of their lives? I don't think that the guy whose mission was to crash an airplane into a building was really concerned with his own survival."

15-Love, Gonzales.

188 posted on 11/20/2001 10:16:26 AM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
For fear of their lives? I don't think that the guy whose mission was to crash an airplane into a building was really concerned with his own survival.

Perhaps not, but fear of failure would be up there.

204 posted on 11/20/2001 1:21:52 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson