Skip to comments.
Bush On Military Tribunals: "I Made Absolutely The Right Decision"
Clymer News Network ^
Posted on 11/19/2001 12:38:31 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
Some Clymer hack (Terry Moran?) just asked Bush for his response to critics that military tribunals endanger a terrorist's Constitutional rights, G.W. said without wavering that these were "extraordinary times", and that he wasn't going to waver. He reminded the leftist press that Franklin Roosevelt, the icon of the socialist Democrats, did the same thing in WWII.
"So to the critics I say, 'I made absolutely the right decision." End of press briefing. Bush was done.
TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
CLASSIC 'IN YOUR FACE' TO THE LEFT! WAY TO GO GEORGE!!
To: tex-oma
Deal with it.
2
posted on
11/19/2001 12:40:09 PM PST
by
veronica
To: Recovering_Democrat
A terrorists constitutional rights?Im not even going to respond further.
3
posted on
11/19/2001 12:40:42 PM PST
by
cardinal4
To: Recovering_Democrat
He also made the point that these were the most evil people we had ever encountered, and that he had to take into account the safety of potential jurors, and he would ALWAYS do everything he could to protect the American people.
THEN he made that comment about how he made the absolutely right decision.
Excellent! To those who don't like it, well, too bad!
To: Recovering_Democrat
Once again, Bush is right and the intelligensia is wrong. Both sides still batting 1000.
To: Recovering_Democrat
'I made absolutely the right decision." End of press briefing. Bush was done. End of story. Too bad, so sad. (gotta love that Bush!)
6
posted on
11/19/2001 12:45:59 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
To: Recovering_Democrat
How can ANYONE even think about the Constitutional rights of ANY terrorist after 9/11! How come the lefties care about people like them? If you could choose between the Constitutional rights of a terrorist or the lives of many innocents, what would they choose I wonder?
To: Recovering_Democrat
This was almost as good as Rumsfeld called a Washington Post reporter a "World Class Thumb Sucker"
The left have had a rough day..... LOL
8
posted on
11/19/2001 12:48:15 PM PST
by
MJY1288
To: Miss Marple
Did you hear Imus this mornig make the point that OUR military has the same type of courts?? "If it's good enogh for our service people then it's good enough for TOWELHEADS"!! Leave it to Imus.
9
posted on
11/19/2001 12:49:48 PM PST
by
Ann Archy
To: Recovering_Democrat
Ah...I love the smell of Stalinism in the morning. You kooks deserve the jackboot that will soon be in your face.
10
posted on
11/19/2001 12:49:50 PM PST
by
Zviadist
To: veronica
Another point was ...How would they be able to SECURE a Courthouse if Bin Laden was tried in one of our courthouses???? Very Good Question!! And can't you just IMAGINE the threats that jurors would get for their LIFE!!! "Dirty" Jurors could get 140 VIRGINS!!
To: Recovering_Democrat
The President also made another good point that I haven't heard:
"How do you protect the jury if terrorist are tried in civil courts"
To: cardinal4
A terrorists constitutional rights?Im not even going to respond further.
One thing you geniuses can't quite get through your blockheads: without a trial there is no way of determining who is or is not a terrorist. There are no enemy uniforms, no "al-Quaeda" membership cards. Secret trials are the hallmark of the old Soviet regime. Here, until you totalitarians began grunting so loudly, we have always had the presumption of innocence as the center of our judicial system -- whether foreigner or citizen.
13
posted on
11/19/2001 12:54:18 PM PST
by
Zviadist
To: Recovering_Democrat
Yeah , way to go, Heil George!
Why should an elected representative of the people have to answer for anything he does?
To: knighthawk
If you could choose between the Constitutional rights of a terrorist or the lives of many innocents, what would they choose I wonder?
A false dichotomy. If it were that simple, why would anyone want consitutional rights for anyone suspected by the government of criminal activity, citizen or no citizen.
15
posted on
11/19/2001 12:56:49 PM PST
by
BikerNYC
To: Recovering_Democrat
stroke of the pen, law of land, so much cooler when a republican does this kind of thing
deal with it
16
posted on
11/19/2001 12:57:38 PM PST
by
fod
To: Ann Archy
When these folks declared war on us they opened themselves up to becoming war criminals and being treated as such. I don't think the relatives of the 9-11 victims should have to endure Johnny Cochran and his ilk playing their courtroom games. Then the appeals for 20 years, then the prison interviews with Connie Chung, and Gore Vidal writing fawning articles about them a la McVeigh.
17
posted on
11/19/2001 12:58:30 PM PST
by
veronica
To: KeepTheEdge
>>Why should an elected representative of the people have to answer for anything he does?<<
Get bent.
To: nicmarlo
LOL sure do love the guy!!!
To: Zviadist
Oh thank you for that great lecture ....us blockheads stand corrected.....becuase you have spoken.
After 9-11....... terrorist's have NO RIGHTS!
Deal with it!
20
posted on
11/19/2001 1:03:17 PM PST
by
Dog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson