Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EricOKC
I don't profess to know everything about oil or other hydrocarbons, but I am skeptical of categorical statements of fact made by people with no background in the business. Especially when those statements contradict what we actually see.

You can put all the truly major discoveries of oil by size on a time bar graph, starting with the giant East Texas Field in 1912 and including the Middle East, Russia, and anyplace else. Despite our ability to go deeper and explore in more inhospitable conditions, the discovery fields continue to get smaller and smaller in size.

The inescapable conclusion is that we've already discovered the "easy" oil that's out there. Could the reserves underlying Antarctica be equivalent to what we've already discovered elsewhere? Conceivably, but we may never know. The politics and economics won't allow it.

Will we discover another "East Texas Field" in the Lower 48? Not a chance.

By the way, the East Texas Field has been mostly plugged now. It's done.

68 posted on 11/19/2001 12:09:36 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
See WSJ article above
73 posted on 11/19/2001 12:16:16 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson