Replies

Saddam Hussein doesn't have any weapons of mass destruction. They were all destroyed ten years ago - with Iraqi cooperation. The last western guy to look around the place resigned from his job because the US refused to lift the embargo once the weapons were gone.

You haven't answered my question. WHAT DO YOU WANT as per Saddam Hussein? Do you want us to kill him, or to lift the embargoes and let him grow powerful again? Because these are the only choices you've given us. You hate the embargo, you obviously want SOMETHING done. Well, WHAT?? Kill Saddam or Help Saddam? Which is it going to be? Dare you answer this question? I dare you. I double-dog dare you.

By the way, on the off chance that you ever do reply to my question about what you think should be done with Saddam Hussein now, and how you think we should have conquered Baghdad without killing any "conscripts," please note today's papers. 700 Taliban soldiers had "surrendered" and were imprisoned in what I suppose would be considered a POW camp. They had smuggled in weapons and revolted, killing several of their captors before they were crushed. I'd like to know how many of our boys you'd like to see killed guarding these treacherous "prisoners," before you'd decide it's better to kill the enemy than to let them kill our personnel. I am still assuming, purely for the sake of argument, that you are actually American.