Mara keeps stating that the SCOTUS has already ruled that Bush is acting properly here. I asked her for a cite. You don't have a cite either, but you feel impelled to put your oar in the water anyway by claiming that the President may do whatever he likes until the SCOTUS rules against him. That's the purest sort of ignorance.
We have a Constitution which is the supreme law of the land. If anyone in government may do anything not expressly prohibited in the document, then our Constitution isn't the magnificent work that millions of people have admired, but instead just a set of comments fit to be printed on a roll of toilet paper.
I do wish that you would stop huffing glue before posting. It makes you look too much like what you are.
I posted two joint Resolutions by congress, the first being the formal DOW on Japan and the one authorizing Bush to act against international terrorism. BOTH are constitutionally sound and BOTH are two different methods of "skinning" the same cat. I have backed up my interpretation with facts, all you and others have done is stomp you feet and whined that it does not fit your argument. I stand by my assertion, in many ways you agree with the rationale used by those that flew those planes into the buildings on Sept. 11. You have shown it over and over again on this forum..