Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Insisted Only He Should Decide Who Should Stand Trial Before Military Court
www.prnewswire.com (Thanks to Drudge) ^ | Nov. 18, 2001 | PRNewswire

Posted on 11/18/2001 1:30:37 PM PST by It'salmosttolate

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-376 next last
To: NotTheMama
Do you always insult people with whom you disagree? Is this the way you talk to people in real life?

No and sometimes, depending on how much they get under my skin. But I never shirk from my beliefs. If I offended you, I apologise, we are all Americans and we all have strong views. But, I gotta tell you, you haven't tocuhed the surface of what a nasty sob I can be given the proper motivation. :-}

FYI, I am as pro life as you are. I think Roe v Wade is wrong but one group of men being wrong on an issue does not condemn the rest for eternity even though there is a good chance that the guys who opened that gate are condemned for eternity.

141 posted on 11/18/2001 4:56:52 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: amundsen
It's very hard to believe that after 9/11 that any American would be for giving to foreign terrorists the same judicial rights as American citizens.It's a shame and a disgrace!
142 posted on 11/18/2001 4:57:44 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #143 Removed by Moderator

To: marajade
Okie dokie. Actually I enjoy reading your posts on FR and find you to be a big stinker.

Thanks! :-}

144 posted on 11/18/2001 4:59:18 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

Comment #145 Removed by Moderator

To: forummonkey
Debating simians doesn't take much thought, wouldn't you agree?
146 posted on 11/18/2001 5:02:46 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

Comment #147 Removed by Moderator

To: Zordas
That Order also violates international treaties and departs from the US demand for non-military trials for Americans in other countries

Cite the treaties and apllicable sections.

148 posted on 11/18/2001 5:05:19 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: forummonkey
"So this is how you lemmings find each other ..."

Careful your getting to where your post could be censured.

149 posted on 11/18/2001 5:06:11 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
A trial by a military court means that the American people will NEVER HEAR THE EVIDENCE!
150 posted on 11/18/2001 5:06:47 PM PST by GROUCHOTWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever; Zordas
I second that request... Please cite specifics.
151 posted on 11/18/2001 5:07:07 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: GROUCHOTWO
The Rules for the Military Tribunal Conducted at Nuremberg
152 posted on 11/18/2001 5:13:00 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

Comment #153 Removed by Moderator

To: lelio
The president is Commander in Chief, these are military courts trying foreign attackers. This is the auspice under which the President is going to use this manner to effectively defend our country from attack. It will be in very special circumstances and not used to try citizens of the U.S.

It's a military function, and rightly so. That's why I infer that it is part of supporting our military as they perform their duty for our common defense.

154 posted on 11/18/2001 5:14:25 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: forummonkey
Very snappy repartee.
155 posted on 11/18/2001 5:15:30 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
The proposed tribunals are to be in secret.
156 posted on 11/18/2001 5:22:50 PM PST by GROUCHOTWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

To: GROUCHOTWO
The proposed tribunals are to be in secret.

As they must be.

158 posted on 11/18/2001 5:26:58 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

Comment #159 Removed by Moderator

To: GROUCHOTWO
Thus far the rules for the proposed tribunals have not been drawn up. I posted the Nurmeberg rules for reference only.
160 posted on 11/18/2001 5:32:16 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-376 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson