Skip to comments.
Bush Insisted Only He Should Decide Who Should Stand Trial Before Military Court
www.prnewswire.com (Thanks to Drudge) ^
| Nov. 18, 2001
| PRNewswire
Posted on 11/18/2001 1:30:37 PM PST by It'salmosttolate
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-376 next last
To: NotTheMama
Do you always insult people with whom you disagree? Is this the way you talk to people in real life?No and sometimes, depending on how much they get under my skin. But I never shirk from my beliefs. If I offended you, I apologise, we are all Americans and we all have strong views. But, I gotta tell you, you haven't tocuhed the surface of what a nasty sob I can be given the proper motivation. :-}
FYI, I am as pro life as you are. I think Roe v Wade is wrong but one group of men being wrong on an issue does not condemn the rest for eternity even though there is a good chance that the guys who opened that gate are condemned for eternity.
To: amundsen
It's very hard to believe that after 9/11 that any American would be for giving to foreign terrorists the same judicial rights as American citizens.It's a shame and a disgrace!
Comment #143 Removed by Moderator
To: marajade
Okie dokie. Actually I enjoy reading your posts on FR and find you to be a big stinker.Thanks! :-}
Comment #145 Removed by Moderator
To: forummonkey
Debating simians doesn't take much thought, wouldn't you agree?
Comment #147 Removed by Moderator
To: Zordas
That Order also violates international treaties and departs from the US demand for non-military trials for Americans in other countries Cite the treaties and apllicable sections.
To: forummonkey
"So this is how you lemmings find each other ..."
Careful your getting to where your post could be censured.
To: CommiesOut
A trial by a military court means that the American people will NEVER HEAR THE EVIDENCE!
To: Texasforever; Zordas
I second that request... Please cite specifics.
To: GROUCHOTWO
Comment #153 Removed by Moderator
To: lelio
The president is Commander in Chief, these are military courts trying foreign attackers. This is the auspice under which the President is going to use this manner to effectively defend our country from attack. It will be in very special circumstances and not used to try citizens of the U.S.
It's a military function, and rightly so. That's why I infer that it is part of supporting our military as they perform their duty for our common defense.
154
posted on
11/18/2001 5:14:25 PM PST
by
D-fendr
To: forummonkey
Very snappy repartee.
To: jwalsh07
The proposed tribunals are to be in secret.
Comment #157 Removed by Moderator
To: GROUCHOTWO
The proposed tribunals are to be in secret. As they must be.
Comment #159 Removed by Moderator
To: GROUCHOTWO
Thus far the rules for the proposed tribunals have not been drawn up. I posted the Nurmeberg rules for reference only.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 361-376 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson