To: grahm_crackers
You know, if real, live active duty American military men "speaking on condition of anonymity" are choosing this moment to tell journalists what lying, incompetent monkies we are, I want every one of those traitors before a military tribunal.
But somehow I don't think it's happening.
4 posted on
11/18/2001 8:02:26 AM PST by
Ratatoskr
To: Ratatoskr
Yeah, I have a real problem with these "anonymous" officials crap. Casualty reports will be made in due time. You stop to honor and grieve your dead when the battle is over, not while it is raging. Make no mistake, the U.S. press is NOT on our side in this war, or any war. They were absolutely instrumental in the U.S. decision to abandon South Vietnam, and as far as I am concerned, there is far more blood on the hands of our press after WWII than there is on the hands of our military.
19 posted on
11/18/2001 8:18:47 AM PST by
walden
To: Ratatoskr
I'll bet the source is not military. The use of "U.S. government official" is, I believe, deliberately broad. The source is a Democrat (or someone on his staff) on the House Armed Services Committee.
63 posted on
11/18/2001 1:00:33 PM PST by
Whilom
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson