Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: forest
Sure, I have heard a few gripes about XP. I don’t have any yet, though. Someone also mentioned “Product Activation” -- calling Microsoft for permission to use your own operating system. However, I was already up and running before that was mentioned to me. Too late now. . . .

Windows 2000 is just as stable but does not require product activation. It also does not require a Passport account.

3 posted on 11/17/2001 1:29:18 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative
Windows 2000 is just as stable but does not require product activation. It also does not require a Passport account.


OK. I hate to sound stupid here. But . . . what's a "Passport Account"?

Whatever it is, I do not think I have one.

I am using this XP computer just exactly as I have used other computers. Same software. Same style of work. Same programs always open. Same everything. All that changed is that it is a lot faster. And, so far, nothing crashed.

7 posted on 11/17/2001 1:39:37 PM PST by Doug Fiedor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
I've been using Windows XP on my Dell laptop since October 24 and I've had nothing but problems. I got the BSOD three times the first day.

From my experience, Beta 2 of Windows 2000 was far more stable than Windows XP gold code! I haven't gone back yet as I work for a software development corporation and my staff will eventually have no choice but to support development on the platform, so we need to know the issues up front. The short and long of it is that my recommendation for those contemplating upgrades or new purchases, "Stick with the tried and true, stable Windows 2000. Don't muck with Windows XP. It's as big a turkey as Windows ME."

On another note, Redaht 7.2 is outstanding. I recommend a KDE 2.2.1 desktop over Gnome, however. Out of the box, it works better on a Cyrix PR233 MHz CPU with 96 MB RAM (yeah...I know, ancient technology) than Windows XP on a 850 MHz Pentium III with 384 MB RAM.

9 posted on 11/17/2001 1:40:02 PM PST by LuvItOrLeaveIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
You're right. Windows 2000 (alias Windows NT v5.0) was put together by the NT group and it is rock solid.
29 posted on 11/17/2001 1:58:36 PM PST by capt. norm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson