I don't think Neville Chamberlin was directly responsible for the death of a single human being. Yet he was a dynamic political leader and negotiated an important agreement. Was he a great man?
I don't think Neville Chamberlin was directly responsible for the death of a single human being. Yet he was a dynamic political leader and negotiated an important agreement. Was he a great man?
Did something I post give you the impression that I agreed with this guy's opinion (post #15)? If so, you need to slow that speed reading down a bit (or I need to improve my communication skills).
Now, about those lunchboxes...