Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:14 PM PST by Rebeckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Howlin; Irma; Miss Marple; Dog Gone
PING!
2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:14 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption,

Geez another uselss JUDICAL WATCH IS LOOKING OUT FOR YOU crap! Hey Larry, if you PUBIC law firm investigates and prosecutes government corruption, why are Hitlery and Bill still walking around?

3 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:14 PM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Larry Clymer is at it again!
4 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:15 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
LOL! JW was all that until they prove they go after corruption democrat or republican. Watch Larry get trashed below.
5 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:15 PM PST by vmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Rebeckie, why did you decide to become a journalist? Just curious.
10 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:21 PM PST by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Larry Klayman is kind of like the boy who cried wolf. Correct me if I'm wrong, but none of his numerous lawsuits and court proceedings ever seem to lead to anything but press releases.
16 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:32 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
You know, when I think of all the good Klayman & Co. have claimed to have done, I always seem to finish the thought with how similar (and empty) x42 & his Bitch's claims are.
17 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:32 PM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
my impression of larry is pretty well the same as that of
sanders saul... who are you, and why are you interrupting this important session?

haven't seen results from these guys, would cheer if i did,
but can't put much on it. maybe i'm just old, ornery and patient.

there's no there there.

18 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:32 PM PST by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Previously posted and thoroughly ridiculed.
19 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:32 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
“As with the Clinton Justice Department, there are many in the Bush Justice Department who believe they are above the law. We hope a federal judge will remind them otherwise,” said Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel.

Unless there was a wholesale purge of Clintonistas when the pervert left, Larry is right on. But then, if a federal judge was going to remind them that they are not above the law, why didn't that judge do it years ago. I'm up to Chapter 9 on Barbara Olson's book and I'm getting more pissed at the judicial system in this country everytime I turn a page.

For what it is worth, Go Larry Go!

20 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:33 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Count on JW. What a joke. STOP supporting JW and Klayman. He uses ANY issue to try and make a name for himself, his organization, and to try and wring more contributions from the suckers he cons.

I used to support this organization, then I grew up. Soundbytes and dollar bills.....that is the REAL goal of JW. How does his agenda differ from Clinton and company? Same game....different name. Please peddle this crap elsewhere. My manure quotient has been exceeded.

25 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:37 PM PST by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie
Larry is right on this one. The Bush crew are covering up so much that you could never hope for the truth about anything. We learned more about the truth when Clinton was in there. At least then there were people looking for it. The sad problem with JW is that they have done some really crazy things in the past year. Things that even I had hold against them and it makes it hard to trust them too. In this case however I have no doubt that they speak the truth.
29 posted on 11/16/2001 1:20:49 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rebeckie

BREAKING- JUDICIAL WATCH HAS NEVER WON A CASE

[It would only be Breaking News if Judicial Watch won one. Until that happens, its all talk.]

33 posted on 11/16/2001 1:21:02 PM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson