Maybe if you stomped on the rudder at 450mph, maybe. However you don't turn an aircraft that way. You do turn most missles that way, it's called skid to turn. With an aircraft, and some missles, cruises for example, you bank the beast to turn it. That way you use the lift force from the wings, i.e. positive Gs in the Up direction of the aircraft, rather than side force, which is hard to generate with that little bitty rudder, and hard on that rudder too. When you bank to turn, you use the rudder to keep the turn "coordinated", that is to minimize those side forces, which just cause more drag, which you don't want. You must also pull back on the stick or yoke, to increase the angle of attack so as to produce the extra lift force that you need to drag yourself around the turn, while still retaining enough of a verticle (earth axis not aircraft axis) component to hold the airplane up against gravity. For example a 45 degree banked turn requires the aircraft to pull 1.414 (sqaure root of 2) G's parrallel to your spine, to keep the aircraft flying level, but turning. You'd get one "G" of "force" vertically and one horizontally. That one "G" of "force" would cause you to turn about 2.8 degrees per second at 450 mph. At a lower speed the same accelleration would be produce a faster turn rate, because the turn rate is inverserly proprotional to the speed and directly proportional to the horizontal accelleration.
psi-dot = 180/Pi * A / V
where psi-dot is the turn rate in degrees per second. A is the accelleratin and V is the speed. Speed and accelleration must be in compatible units, such as ft/sec/sec and ft/sec or meters/sec/sec and meters/second. The turn rate comes out in degrees per unit time, if you want to use some other measure of time, minutes, hours, days or fortnights. Leave off the 180/Pi if you want the rate in radians per second.
Never try to do engineering calculations with furlongs as the measure of length and fornights as the measure of time. You'd be sure to blow a gasket somewhere along the way, and your bridge would surely fall or your airplane crash. :).
LOL!! For some reason, I am far more reliable doing calculations in imperial units. I guess I've gotten use to them, and it's always a good reality check on the calculations if you can "see" the units - ie, I can visualize a mile but not a km. I can visualize a lbf., but not a N. That being said, metric units are more elegant, but I prefer imperial when doing my calculations(although I never use furlongs and fortnights!).