Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LTCJ
They were saying it was a lateral force, but he also said the plane experienced another acceleration at the same time, I think vertical was what he said.
32 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:09 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Purely speculation but from what you're telling me I'd expect that it was +0.8g vertical and +/-0.3g lateral.

While 0.3g's laterally is a lot, with normal onset it is no where near enough to rip the vertical off a healthy airplane. If there were other prior damage it might do it. There have been questions about design load spectra on an unidentified Airbus type but I can't know if is a contributing factor here.

So far the most excessive thing I've seen is the amount of talking the NTSB is doing at this stage of the investigation. Now THAT's extraordinary.

110 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:26 PM PST by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson