Amazing how this is so clear to your here, but escapes your notice elsewhere.
Not amazing that you never bother to read anything carefully enough to know what you're talking about.
I have never advocated anything less than the robust exchange of views as well as the right of a private employer to hire and fire as he wishes. E.g., I have resisted the efforts of gay activists to shut Laura Schlesinger down by boycotts, but never have I suggested they were in the wrong for using boycotts for that purpose.
It is the mush-brained libertarians who cannot draw essential distinctions between message and method, between person and perversion.
Don't blame me for errors that arise in in your mind due to your own faulty eyesight.