Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A bit more detail in this article.
1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:09:52 PM PST by Solson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zordas
This confirms more of your thoughts...
2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:09:52 PM PST by Solson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
The vertical stab is "it". Whatever went wrong started here. But...

"the vertical stabilizer was the first piece of debris found, followed by the rudder about 200 yards further down the flight path."

This seems odd, though. The rudder is attached to the fin; so, it should've come off with the fin. And, if it subsequently separated from the fin, why would it have been found further down the flight path. Significantly so -- since the airframe went down a half mile away, the rudder was a full quarter of the way further down the track.

Is the rudder also separately attached to the tailcone? So that it might have been left "hanging", before it too separated?

6 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:14 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Black said investigators noted "noises" on an air traffic control tower tape of communications between controllers and Flight 587. The noises -- which Black did not describe in detail -- were heard at about the time crew lost control. He did not say what the sounds indicated.

What kind of noise did they hear? Why no detail on this?

7 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:15 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Here's another Interesting Post
14 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:32 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson; All
If anyone gets into a conversation about directional EMP, please flag me. I don't have time to read this thread or the responses, so forgive me if this idea is redundant and has already been discussed. Be back later.
16 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:33 PM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Now, my question is this...why no reports of eyewitnesses who spoke quite definitively about flames and smoke near the wings. Or did I miss this in the article. Again...only airline pilots and ground crews are credible eyewitnesses? Check out any news footage of interviewing the people who actually saw the thing go down. There's plenty of 'em. Everyone says flames and smoke.
40 posted on 11/16/2001 1:23:59 PM PST by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Now, my question is this...why no reports of eyewitnesses who spoke quite definitively about flames and smoke near the wings. Or did I miss this in the article. Again...only airline pilots and ground crews are credible eyewitnesses? Check out any news footage of interviewing the people who actually saw the thing go down. There's plenty of 'em. Everyone says flames and smoke.
41 posted on 11/16/2001 1:23:59 PM PST by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
I think the rattling noise was some guy with an air wrench. (Didn't you ever see the episode of Twilight Zone where a guy was out on the wing tearing off parts of the plane?)
46 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:20 PM PST by HangThemHigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson