Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meridia
I have to agree with you. When I was entering college back in '79 had I said I was going into journalism, my parents would have scoffed. The attitude of everyone back then was those who went into journalism went in because it was easy and they basically didn't have the I.Q. to go for anything harder.
24 posted on 11/16/2001 1:06:41 PM PST by GussiedUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: GussiedUp
Right. Journalists in the mainstream abandoned their role as critics of the White House for Clinton's reign. It's the hieghth of idiocy to point to modern "journalists" and make a point about how they savaged Bill Clinton. The opposite is true, big media protected and defended his highness for nine years, insisting the emperors new robes were grand.

Remember "the work of the people", "let's move on", "only about sex", "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"?

This clymer wouldn't last 10 minutes in a decent locker room discussion with informed citizens. Oh, wait. He's a Democrat Journalist (redundency), so he'll never be in one of those.

37 posted on 11/16/2001 1:06:50 PM PST by moodyskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson