Replies

Angel- your proofs or facts don't stand the test of proofs leading to causality. What you have assembled are data that have correlational or chance relationships to this crash. What you need to show is that each of the facts you assembled have the status of causality. You might be correct on all accounts, but you have not shown that to be the case. Merely listing these various events doesn't give them a "causal" status. If I am not mistaken the tail wing came off first over the water and then the engine fell off over land. That means the engine didn't hit the tail assembly. That means an engine failure didn't cause the tail assembly to drop off. I think a serious look should take place with the ground mechanics for possible sabotage.