Posted on 11/13/2001 10:16:00 AM PST by FresnoDA
American Airlines Flight 587's Crash
was NOT an Accident.
Angel Shamaya 11.13.01
Consider the following known facts:
1) The airplane that went down was an American Airlines jet. American Airlines was used against America on 9/11. It bears the name of our nation, making it, once again, a juicy target for those who hate our country. (The airlines used on 9/11 were American and United -- the latter likely chosen to "prove" that were are not united.)
2) The airplane went down on Veteran's Day, a slap in the face of all Vets -- including those who are painting the Afghanistan desert floor with Taliban blood.
3) The airplane went down during the UN General Assembly meetings between a host of international dignitaries, in the same city where the meetings were taking place, as meetings were underway, in the same city where the largest attacks of 9/11 took place. The likely message received by the leaders of countless nations of the world: "America is losing it."
4) The engine separated from the plane, as did at least one major section of the airfoil structures (tail fin, shown recovered from the waters off of New York, CNN, not long after the crash). Reports from multiple pilots -- including one who witnessed the crash and the engine's separation from the plane -- say they have NEVER known of mere engine failure to make engines and tail fins fly off of airplanes -- in this or any other modern aircraft of its type.
5) The federal government is on record as saying the crash was "an accident" -- "some sort of engine failure" -- long before they had the voice recorder or the flight data recorder (black box, which as of this writing they claim not to have yet recovered) in their possession -- curious and suspicious to a very high degree as it's highly unscientific and unprofessional. This even though they have no records of previous airplane crashes showing such unusual "separation of parts" prior to accidental (mechanical failure) crashes of the same or similar planes as was seen in this "accident." Instead, they specifically, clearly and IMMEDIATELY released statements that break with investigatory patterns involving conclusive statements pointing to causes of crashes.
QUESTION:
What are the chances of all of the above known factors coming into play at the same time?
ANSWER:
So remote as to reside -- on the Scale of Probabilities -- somewhere between:
A) "gross statistical impossibility"
B) "utterly impossible and pointing to a clear, unmistakable cover-up."
Pick one.
I say it's B, for the following primary reasons:
1) The government and the airlines industry was, even as the flames were still burning after the crash of AA597, urging the American people to book flights for Thanksgiving and Christmas. Their fears of travel downturns are being realized, and the economic impact of said downturn is being felt painfully throughout the industry and thus the nation. Another terrorist attack just prior to one of the two largest travel weeks in the year could literally put a couple of the airlines out of business for good and have untold negative economic consequences, none of which looks good for our depressed economy.
They want you to keep propping up the American Empire with your federal reserve notes -- backed ONLY by your belief in them -- before they are no longer worth anything.
2) The federal government has been exhibiting -- forever -- a lack of trust and faith in the ability of the American people to handle the truth. They don't think you are "mature enough" to handle the truth. Your great- and great-great- and great-great-great-grandparents couldn't handle the truth about massacres of native American indians, so they painted the genocides as righteous events. Et cetera, throughout our history, right up to Waco where We The People "couldn't handle the truth" that a host of FBI and BATF agents were cold blooded murderers of innocent American women and children, so anything but the truth was made known even though what we were told was way beyond preposterous.
Your government doesn't trust you, believe in you, have faith in you, respect you or your judgement and certainly doesn't believe you can deal with the fact that the latest flying bomb was downed intentionally. But they want you to keep your head in the sand and fly another potential flying bomb in hopes you get to and from your holiday destinations alive. Those who don't, mark my words, will be declared the victims of another "accident." Either that or a "Thanksgiving Airline Disaster" would be used to justify giving some federal agency another $40 billion "to protect you." Or both.
If your government doesn't trust you, isn't honest with you, lies directly to you, hides facts and avoids discussions of known facts while trying to lure more money out of your pocket and safety from your life..., what does that say about their opinion of you?
And what does that mean about your relationship to them?
Angel Shamaya is the Founder/Executive Director of KeepAndBearArms.com
This is one of the most putrified pieces of tripe I've read lately, even here, yet at first glance it almost appears to be logical. But so does a syllogism. ("Clouds bring rain. It's cloudy today. Therefore, it is raining.")
This could be a terrorist act, or not. But right now, when it takes the NTSB a minimum of three months to issue a final report on ANY such crash, to say "look at the calendar, look at the map, it CAN'T be an accident!" is borderline hysteria, something America can do without when some are freaking out over spilled Arm&Hammer baking soda.
But then, being a conspiracy theorist can be quite a comfortable life. Think about it: anyone who disagrees with you, for any reason, is ipso facto part of the conspiracy! Beautiful!
Here's a link for some info, just so I don't get totally lumped into the TinFoil crowd.
Apparently, LME is a real occurence. But the question remains: Are there "Agents" that can cause it. (pun intended)
7) It was scheduled to occur on the 12th, NOT the 13th! They were telling all of us that this was more than just Tuesday the 13th bad luck!
I'm tellin' you mon, it's in de cahds! Mmmm-Hmmmm... An ahm also warnin' ya darlin' you husban be messin' aroun on ya, too!
No, I don't trust the government, but I have better reasons to be suspicious than this steamin' load o' logic.
OK FOLKS, IF WE ARE GOING TALK FOIL, LET'S ROLL!!!
Post Office Box 90, Clements, Maryland 20624 USA
Last updated: November 13, 2001
|
The Associated Retired Aviation Professionals was formed in early 1997. Its members include former military, civilian, and aviation professionals who are committed to independently investigating the mysterious crash of TWA Flight 800 on July 17, 1996. Introduction CDR. William S. Donaldson, USN (ret.), challenged the official NTSB position on the cause of the crash of TWA Flight 800 in a series of letters to James Hall, Chairman of the NTSB between April 1997 and December 2000. Over the past four years, CDR. Donaldson worked with other Retired Aviation Professionals, including some previous crash investigators as well as persons inside the NTSB investigation itself. CDR. Donaldson has extensive experience as a Naval crash investigator and he and others concluded that the NTSB's explanation of the Center Wing Tank explosion was not credible. With the help of these other concerned aviation professionals, CDR. Donaldson produced an extensive report on the cause of the crash. The initial Interim Report was delivered to the House Aviation Subcommittee on July 16th, 1998. Recently uncovered information now shows that TWA Flight 800 could have been shot down by one or more shoulder-fired missiles. The FBI was briefed by military missile experts in the Fall of 1996 that Flight 800 was well within the range of a shoulder fired missile. The FBI conducted a covert dredging operation for stinger missile parts between November 1996 and April 1997. CDR. Donaldson brought this new evidence to the House Aviation Subcommittee in testimony on May 6, 1999. Unfortunately, the major media and the Congress are content to swallow the official line without question. This website is dedicated to CDR Donaldson's memory and outstanding leadership in searching for the truth. |
|
September 11, 2001: Mr. George Stephanopoulos, former assistant to President Clinton, on ABC TV with Peter Jennings in mid afternoon talked about the two situation rooms in the White House. Stephanopoulos: "There are facilities in the White House, not the normal situation room, which everyone has seen in the past, has seen pictures of. There is a second situation room, behind the primary situation room, which has video conferencing capabilities. The director of the Pentagon, the defense chief, can speak from a national military command center at the Pentagon. The Secretary of State can speak from the State Department, the President from wherever he is, and they'll have this capability for video conferencing throughout this crisis." Senator Kerry On Larry King Live: Tonight (9-11-01), Senator Kerry, who was on the Intelligence Committee until last year, includes Flight 800 along with the embassy bombings in discussing our reaction to terrorism! Transcript. Senator John Kerry on MSNBC Hardball w/ Chris Matthews (9/24/01 7:15pm E.S.T.) "You know, we've had terrorism for a long time now. We've had the Achille Lauro, the Munich Olympics, the pipe bomb at the Olympics in Atlanta, the TWA 800, the bombing of embassies, and it's not going to disappear overnight." Transcript James Kallstrom was quoted on network television yesterday as saying: "this is the first time since TWA 800," inferring that TWA was an act of terrorism. (Editor's Note: Mr. Kallstrom denied making any such statements today (9-17-01) when I asked him to comment on these reports.) If anyone has video tape of Mr. Kallstrom's comments, please contact ARAP so we can get a verified transcript. Kallstrom on CBS with Dan Rather, 9-11-01: "We need to stop the hypocrisy, not that hypocrisy got us to this day. I'm not saying it did. But this is serious business, and--and those of us in law enforcement over the years and intelligence work over the years didn't know what day this would happen, hoped it would never happen, but thought surely some day, it might happen." Transcript MSNBC interview by Brian Williams with Mr. Isaac Yeffet, the former Director of Security for El-Al Airlines, 9/28/2001 at approximately 8:30 pm, ET. Brian Williams: "Do you think the US is still under the threat of terrorist hijackings, of aircraft being used as flying bombs? With your knowledge of the terrorism business, do you think they won't just move on to another mode of delivering terror?" Isaac Yeffet (English is not his first language): "We thought in the past, in the '70's, that what happened with the US air carriers, this would be the end of the terrorist attack. Look what happened since Lockerbie, PanAm103? What happened to TWA 800? Look now what happened? Who can guarantee us that the terrorists will decide no more attacks in the US, unless somebody will tell me that we took control over the terrorist organizations and we let them know that here, they cannot come." Boston's WRKO (680AM) whose featured guest was a man by the name of Isaac Yeffet who is the former security head of El Al. At one point he was asked about the Russian plane just downed in the Baltic Sea with the conjecture that it was a terrorist attack. He stated that it wasn't a terrorist act because it left from Israel. He said it was probably a missile. Minutes later ABC broke in with the info that it is now believed that a SAM missile may have been responsible. But back to my main point.....Mr. Yesset listed terrorist attacks against the U.S. and he included TWA 800. He was later questioned about that...and he said there was no question in his mind that there was no mechanical failure, that it was a terrorist attack. WorldNetDaily - Shippers on Metcalf Today - 10-15-01 NetTalkDaily 8:00 pm ET CNN Cops out on Jack Cashill Interview and Video |
Commemorate the 5th Anniversary of the Crash of TWA Flight 800 with a Free Bumper Sticker: WorldNetDaily Exclusive - Haunting evidence of missile attack 5-31-01 WorldNetDaily Exclusive - The Real Bin Laden -10-8-01 bin Laden: The man who declared war on America - Bodansky, 1999 Editors Note: This book was published in 1999 and has been listed on this website since that time. His description of "raising the ante" has a chilling ring after the World Trade Center attack. When viewed in the context of current events and with 100 eyewitnesses seeing a missile, does anybody really think that Flight 800 was not a terrorist act? WorldNetDaily - Why Airline Security Failed - 10-9-01 WorldNetDaily - Satellites Tell the Truth - 10-13-01 WorldNetDaily - Shippers on Metcalf Today - 10-15-01 NetTalkDaily 8:00 pm ET - Transcript 10-23-01 WorldNetDaily - Middle East - OKC Connection -10-20-01 WorldNetDaily - Middle East - OKC Connection - 10-21-01 WorldNetDaily - Time to Come Clean - 10-29-01 WorldNetDaily - Why We Were Caught Off Guard - 11-1-01 WorldNetDaily - Ossama's Nuclear Bomb - 11-8-01 WorldNetDaily - Clinton Blames America - 11-9-01 WorldNetDaily - Kallstrom's Quest for Redemption - 11-12-01 WorldNetDaily - Thinking the Unthinkable - 11-13-01 Index of other WorldNetDaily articles on Flight 800 |
WTC Plot Known Since 1995 - 9-20-01 Message from Boeing -10-5-01 Requires PowerPoint to view. If you don't have PowerPoint, click here to download PowerPoint Viewer. Letter To NTSB Managing Director Daniel Campbell -10-9-01 New York Times - Terrorism Arrests -10-11-01 Suffolk Life (Long Island) Editorial - 10-3-01 AviationWeek - FAA: A Failure of Aviation Security - 10-8-01 Wired News - FBI Warns of "Skyfall" Attack - 10-12-01 ABC - Missile Blamed for Crash - 10-12-01 "According to Ukrainian media reports, metal fragments similar to shrapnel contained in the missile's warhead, were found in victims' bodies and in the body of the plane." Editor's Note: Maybe this is why the FBI won't release the Medical Examiner's Report on the Flight 800 victims. Chicago Tribune - Americans Facing Missile Made in the USA - 10-21-01 Accuracy in Media - Less Freedom of Information - Reed Irvine - 10-25-01 Critique of On-Line Journalism Course - 10-26-01 Fuel Tank Explosiveness - 10-26-01 Iraq Connections to U.S. Extremists - 10-30-01 Full Text of Terror Guide - 11-4-01 FOIA Appeal to NTSB General Counsel from Capt. Ray Lahr - 11-5-01 FOIA Appeal to NTSB General Manger from Capt. Ray Lahr - 11-6-01 Encyclopedia of Terror Revealed - Sunday Times - 11-4-01 American Airlines Plane Crashes in New York - 11-12-01 Megadata Announces Flight Path Replay for AA Flight 587 - 11-12-01 AP - Plane Crashes Near Kennedy Airport - 11-12-01 AP - List of Major Plane Crashes - 11-12-01 Flight 587's Last Known Position, Altitude and Speed Information From the PASSUR System Is Released - 11-12-01 Major Plane Crashes in the last 20 Years - 11-12-01 Air Disaster.com - 11-12-01 Eyewitness on a boat: "I heard a POP then the wing fell off and hit the whole tail wing came off then it nosed right down when stabilizer fell off it bellied over and nosed straight down" 11-12-01 Former NTSB Official Doubts Accident Caused Flight 587 Crash - 11-12-01 NewsMax - The Ghost of TWA 800 - by Christopher Ruddy -11-13-01 Air Roulette Anyone? -11-13-01
FBI Internal Memo showing two missile launch points - 10-14-96 Terrorists Smuggled Missiles into America - 8-25-96 Cockpit's Tangled Remains Leave Investigators Puzzled -8-5-01 Update Record - Check here for a history of past updates |
Warning Areas - Investigation shows existence of Aviation Warning Area, but No Nautical Warning Area. In fact, there is a major shipping channel directly under the W-105 warning area. This undermines the friendly fire theory, which hypothesizes that ships entering this area prove there was a Navy exercise progress. Warning Areas: Definition from the FAA & Statement by CDR. Donaldson - Much has been made about the existence or nonexistence of Navy ships in the vicinity of TWA Flight 800 at the time of the crash. The proximity of the crash to FAA Warning Area W-105 has led some to believe that the crash was the result of a Navy exercise gone bad. The Navy has denied that any of its ships were in the area. Others point to the radar data and claim it is evidence of a "fleet" entering W-105. W-105 and W106 are FAA Warning Areas only. These areas do not show up on nautical charts and a check with the US Coast Guard confirms that there are no military warning areas anywhere off the south coast of Long Island. Further reviews of "Notices to Mariners" confirm that there were no maritime exercises scheduled in the immediate vicinity of W-105 & W-106 in the month of July, 1996. These same Notice to Mariners show scheduled firing exercises off the coast of MASS, but nowhere near Long Island. It is clear from this review that W-105 and W-106 are Aviation Warning Areas only, so any implication that radar showing ships entering the area proves they were Navy ships, is clearly inappropriate. CDR. Donaldson believes that the radar data could just as easily show commercial and sport fishermen out fishing and nothing more. You decide. 1-25-01 Nautical Chart of Crash Area 1-20-01 Aeronautical Chart of Crash Area 1-20-01 Chart Showing Location of Military Exercise Area on 7-17-96 - 1-25-01 Updated Plot of Crash Site with Radar Overlay - Shows boats & aircraft in the vicinity of the crash. Plots are from 11 minutes before the explosion until 14 minutes after the explosion. The data comes from raw NTSB radar data originally released under FOIA and now publicly available on NTSB CD dated August 2000 |
ARAP's Interim Report - July 16, 1998 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Final Report The IAMAW, an official Party to the investigation, issued its final report to the NTSB and their conclusions as a result of their participation in the investigation. An excerpt: Click here to for the Highlights or the Full Report. Boeing Releases its Report to the NTSB - pdf format - 547 K - 5-10-00 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Final Report - Full Report. International Aviation Industry - Aircraft Fuel System Safety Program Report -8-16-00 Airline Pilots Association - Submission to the NTSB on TWA Flight 800 (4.9mb) -4-30-00 TWA Submission to the NTSB NTSB Witness CD and Eyewitness Group Report Supervisor of Salvage Report Missile Impact Analysis 1.5mb pdf, gif 688 kb - China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center -12-97 Wing Fragmentation - Exhibit 7A Appendix A3 NTSB Website - Documents for Final Hearing -8-22-00 Transcript of Jim Hall's Statement at Final Hearing- 8-22-00 NTSB Final Report - Full Report (7.6M), Appendixes (8.9M), Abstract NTSB Releases Eyewitness Database - Database identifies location of each witness Witness Summary - pdf file Witness Geography - pdf file Witness Coordinates - pdf file Witness Database - excel file NTSB Releases Accident Investigation Manual Accident Manual - Volume 1 - Acrobat Format, MSWord Format Accident Manual - Volume 2 - Acrobat Format, MSWord Format Accident Manual - Volume 3 - Acrobat Format, MSWord Format Accident Manual - Volume 4 - Acrobat Format, MSWord Format |
|
Missile-Like Sightings Around Long Island Animation of Several Missile Sightings - by Ian Goddard - 7-17-01 Full Size Animation - If animation does not work - click here Detailed list of other Missile Sightings around Long Island - by Mike Hull -7-19-01 Witness 649 made this drawing for the FBI and it clearly shows an object heading in the opposite direction of Flight 800 (west) , impact the aircraft and then the entire wreckage falling to the east. Click on the picture to see an animation. Animated Drawing of Witness 649's Sketch - Courtesy of Ian Goddard 7-17-01 231k The Case of Witness 649 - Debunking the NTSB & CIA Theories August 15, 2000. The Washington Times carried a full page ad from the TWA 800 Eyewitness Alliance demanding that they be heard. The ad claims that the FBI and NTSB have lied to the American public and that hundreds of people witnessed a missile shoot down Flight 800. It concludes: "We, the eyewitnesses know that missiles were involved. We don't know who launched them, but we know that for some reason our government has lied and tried to discredit all of us to keep that question from being addressed." ... "The claim that our evidence is worthless is false and we want to know who is behind it. Hundreds of us SAW what happened. The FBI, the CIA and the NTSB must not be allowed to get away with this cover-up by defamation of the eyewitnesses. We appeal to those who know why this is being done to share their information with us. Confidentiality is guaranteed. FIRO - Witness Sketches - 12-22-00 The Flight 800 Researchers Organization has published an article on the many eyewitnesses who actually drew sketches of what they saw. This is very enlightening reading. New Witness Sketch located - Previously "Lost" By FBI - 12-26-00 The Expert Witness Radio Show - TWA 800 Revisited - December 2000 Mike Levine interviews 3 witnesses who SAW rockets take down the flight of TWA-800. For more information on this topic, see the interview with Rodney Stich page. http://www.expertwitnessradio.com/audio/expertwitnesstwa800.ram Press Release on NTSB Lawsuit -5-10-01 The Mega Society - Witness Sketches Contradict Officials - by Ian Goddard -4-9-01 Lines of Sight - Witness 649 and the NTSB's Final Report - by Tom Shoemaker - 3-19-01 An excellent and detailed analysis of how the NTSB screwed up the evaluation of Witness 649. NTSB Witness CD and Eyewitness Group Report Eyewitness Highlights - Selected Accounts from the 755 reports NTSB Releases Eyewitness Database - NTSB Eyewitness Analysis by Mike Hull Triangulation of Eyewitness Sightings Click here for an updated version of the Eyewitness Triangulation (pdf). Gif Version. NTSB Eyewitness Group Factual Report - Exhibit 4A (html version) Relevant data from the Eyewitness Group Factual Report:
Lisa Perry Sighting of Military Warship - Exhibit 35 - 11-18-98 Drawing of Warship sighted by Lisa Perry From Jane's Fighting Ships - 11-18-98 Photos of Warship from Jane's Fighting Ships - 11-18-98 Eyewitness Statement of Paul Angelides - 32 k - 7-28-98 Aphrodite's Encounter with mysterious boats 3 minute Streaming Video recreation (389k) of witnesses Gipe and Angelides view of the crash - requires RealPlayer - 11-21-98, Download video file (389k) Full 10 minute Streaming Video recreation of witnesses Gipe and Angelides view of the crash - requires RealPlayer - 1,295k - 11-22-98 Download Video File Eyewitness report of Captain McClaine - 5-24-1999 Eyewitness interview by Richard Hirsch - 7-16-99 NTSB Eyewitness Group Factual Report Exhibit 4A - Not publicly released by NTSB -9-2-99 E-Mail from an Eyewitness |
Radar Analysis - Shows missile impact & proves eyewitnesses did not see "Flight 800 in various stages of crippled flight". The eyewitnesses saw a missile! Radar of Additional Boats in the area of the crash of TWA Flight 800(16k pdf file) Speed in knots indicated on graphic Letter to NTSB Chairman Hall - 2-19-00 html version of letter. Analysis of NTSB Exhibit 22c - The recently released radar data has been compared with the NTSB's trajectory study in Exhibit 22c and a careful analysis shows that Exhibit 22c is internally inconsistent. Two different graphs in Exhibit 22c show widely different times for Flight 800 to be in the air. The graph (figure 10) which shows the CIA/NTSB simulation of the aircraft climbing (like a streaking missile) shows the aircraft was airborne for more than 53 seconds. The graph (figure 18) which shows the radar track from the Islip ASR-8 radar shows 9 radar hits which equal 42.2 seconds. A careful sweep by sweep analysis of the raw radar data has shown that there were only 8 radar hits which equals 37.5 seconds. This leaves more than 15 seconds unaccounted for. If the aircraft fell in a ballistic arc from the initial explosion, it would have hit the water after 8 radar sweeps. If the aircraft did a "zoom climb" as postulated by the CIA and NTSB simulations, it would have been at 15,000 ft or 8,000 ft. after Sweep 8 and should have still been visible on radar for another 16 seconds, or 3-4 radar sweeps. It was not. Because it was already in the water. Analysis of Exhibit 22c in gif format. Page 1, Page 2. Added 2-17-00 E-Mail to Dennis Crider - NTSB - Questions about Exhibit 22c anomalies Response from Bernard Loeb - NTSB - Director of Aviation Safety Raw Radar Data Files - Zip Format |
Stinger Man Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) "Since initial deployment Stinger has, in combat, defeated more modern fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters than any other fighter, helicopter or missile system worldwide since the Second World War." Jane's Defense Weekly See Jane's Defense Weekly description of the Stinger Capability - 10-19-00
Military Stinger Test looks a lot like what the Eyewitnesses Described --------->----------> |
The Families of TWA Flight 800, Inc. List of Passengers & Crew members of Flight 800 A Tribute to the Crew of TWA Flight 800 |
Search Amazon for other Flight 800 works:
|
Commemorate the 5th Anniversary of the Crash of TWA Flight 800 and bring attention to the unresolved mystery with a high quality vinyl bumper sticker: Send a self addressed, stamped envelope to: ARAP, P.O. Box 90, Clements, Maryland 20624. Any donations will be contributed to the Families of Flight 800 Memorial Fund |
If you have information pertinent to this investigation: E-mail to: ARAP
|
Search WWW Search twa800.com |
What not is hard to explain, no one really knows what it is because its not.
Chemical weapons range from old-fashioned poison in the water and nerve gas to a new Liquid Metal Embrittlement agent (LME). Applied with a felt-tip type pen, LME is a clear, invisible substance that changes the chemical structure of a metal so that it is no longer resilient and flexible. The result: The metal can fracture under stress. Trucks, airplanes, or bridges would be vulnerable to catastrophic failure without advance warning.
Okay, it goes like this. Tinfoil hat loosely refers to something that is deemed too wacky to be believable. It seems to me that there are basically three camps of believers as per "tinfoil-ia."
1: Rabid, foaming at the mouth, all tinfoil-all the time.
2: Middle of the road, basically open minded folks who know that there are things that can't always be adequately explained to everyones satisfaction.
3: Rabid, foaming at the mouth, "electricity is tinfoil!" type folks.
Here's an assignment for you: Start a thread about, oh, let's say, contrails, and you'll get all three camps, all stating their beliefs. That is, if the thread isn't pulled first.
Try it, sit back, and observe.
According to those who know from experience with gummint conspiracies, tin foil on your head is the only protection against the radio microwaves transmitted by the FBI, CIA, NSA (substitute your favourite acronym here) to control your brain!
Please note, this was just a idea. I've no proof and have not made up my mind (unlike others here :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.