To: American_Patriot_For_Democracy
We keep Saddam around because he suits our needs. He's the bad cop to our good cop, the stick to our carrot. How else would we justify our military presence in the Gulf?
To: Lejes Rimul
Which is exactly my point. The stakes have now gone up, and nuclear technology is part of your much coveted and so-called "policy." You are downplaying the fact that Pakistan has nukes. We left Saddam alive, and he sent us anthrax and financed global terrorism. We left bin Ladin alive, and we got 6,000 dead at the World Trade Center, and the horrific bombings in Sudan and the U.S.S. Cole. If this policy keeps up, and we give Mussharaf his 28 F-16 fighters (this is actually being debated in Congress), in addition to his healthy little "reward" of over 1.5 billion dollars, the next time it won't be 6,000 people dying on American soil, it may very well be billions of innocent people.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson