Replies

George Bush has more or less ignored India, a vibrant, democratic, pro-Western nation. Why?

I don't get it. What does India need from G-dub? Doesn't a nation of 1 billion have an army and other resources with which to redress their differences with Pakistan? If that's how they feel, India should have "gotten it on" with Pakistan long before the USA got involved over there for separate, more complex reasons.

Besides that, what's with being an American and yet having one's main and only foreign policy hardon over India, of all places?

Great comment, but unfortunately, India has been all but "hog-tied" when it has come to Pakistan. The United States, Great Britain, and the U.N. (heavily dominated by Islamic leaders) have strongly "discouraged" India from taking Pakistan out, once and for all. That is the reason why we are paying the price today. Even now, India is straining at the leash. But still, the U.S. and Britain are "cautioning" India to abstain from turning Pakistan into the stool smear that it should be. What would you do?