Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KQQL
..... She said: "My view on this is pretty simple .....

Good Lord Almighty!

Headline!

Hildebeaste Rotten-Blythe-KKKli'toon Tells The Truth!

3 posted on 11/10/2001 10:59:25 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Allen
"Mrs. Clinton then gave her historical perspective"


30 posted on 11/10/2001 11:51:41 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Allen
simple isn't an accurate description of this idiot's economic thinking, most 12 year-olds have a more sophisticated understanding of the causes of prosperity than is revealed in this truly pitiful opinion

eight years of prosperity...because we paid down our debt and got rid of our deficit

first, and got rid of our deficit is superflous, because as any moron knows, you can't pay down any net debt while you are still incurring additional debt by continuing to run a deficit

i will ignore the fact that scumbag variously said that it would take 10, 5, 9, 7 and 8 years to eliminate the deficit, all just months prior to being dragged kicking and screaming to sign the legislation

leaving eight years of prosperity...because we paid down our debt as the only utterance worth examining

it reveals her underlying belief that only the government controls our economic destiny by implying that no prosperity would have been possible if the government had instead run deficits and increased total debt

which, of course, ignores what scumbag wanted to do and actually did, as the fact is that total federal debt only started decreasing after 1999 (u.s. treasury debt totals)

it ignores the fact that it's impossible to credit "8 years of prosperity" to debt reduction when debt hasn't been reduced until the 8th year

it ignores the fact that the previous 20 years of prosperity had coincided with rising federal debt (not a causal factor, just a fact)

and, finally, although this economic illiterate would probably call herself a keynesian, her implication is that more debt reduction is always a good thing, a statement any actual keynesian would retch at

in any case, after ridiculing her statement, we should hold the imbecile to it and its implications, as it surely leads to the opposite of her real preference to spend all national income as she, and only she, sees fit

the wicked witch of the east has succeeded only in conclusively demonstrating that she's not fit to run a kool-aid stand

41 posted on 11/11/2001 12:46:18 AM PST by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Allen
Her thoughts are WHOR-ENDOUS.
83 posted on 11/11/2001 7:51:35 AM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson