Clearly, you all love him and find him flawless. I don't agree, but I have no problem with that. You are all perfectly entitled to that view, as I am to mine. What fascinates me is that you won't admit that he can't stand President Bush. It's obvious. He's as transparent about it as John McCain is.
You ridicule people who say Keyes bashes Bush, which leads me to believe you have evidence that Alan Keyes respects and is kind to the man who defeated him and went on to become President of the United States. I'd like to see it. I really would. I've watched him, and I've always had the impression that he thinks about as much of George W. Bush as Al Gore does.
He's critical of Bush - always has been, always will be. That's all right, but why pretend otherwise? I don't get it. Maybe some people don't like the idea that he's envious of another man, because that would disqualify him from sainthood.
I am truly sorry for the typo - I meant RNC - have no idea how the D jumped there instead. I think this typo unleashed this fury in you - again my apologies for the typo.
There was a message (#66) from Hawlin that brought my attention where he writes:
Dear, you must be new to the Keyes threads: here's the way it works; one of them posts an article written by Keyes…
It's a fine irony - may I offer another interpretation?
Every Saturday Dr Keyes publishes an article in WorldNetDaily.com; Mr. KFP takes it upon himself to promptly post it here.
Many people wait for the article - some to admire the mature thought and some to bash the author.
How is that? Which type are you?