Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The whole point is that a very, very small percentage of southerners EVER owned slaves. They were a luxury of the very wealthy, so it is very likely that none of the ancestors of those of us on this board owned slaves. I have researched my family history, and while I have found relatives from Kentucky who fought on both sides in the war, I have yet to find a single slave owner. If I did, I would not deny it. Our history, be it glorious or shameful, is part of who we are, and not liking it doesn't change it.
90 posted on 11/10/2001 9:48:50 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: sweetliberty
The whole point is that a very, very small percentage of southerners EVER owned slaves.

I grew up in a large family, 8 kids. My dad worked and my mom didn't drive so while we had a car, it was registered and licensed in my father's name and he was the sole driver. So one way of looking at it is that only 10% of the people in my family owned a car. But we all reaped the benefits of car ownership. Likewise with slavery. The total number of slave owners may have been around 6 or 7 percent, depending on the state, but undoubtably almost all of those slave-owners had wives and children. Looking at it that way, almost 50% of the families in Mississippi owned slaves. Over 40% of the families in South Carolina and Georgia. Over all, almost 30% of the families in the south owned slaves. So that is why it was so important to them. They weren't fighting to defend the rights of 6% of the population, they were fighting to defend an institution that almost a third of them had directly benefited from.

100 posted on 11/11/2001 2:21:32 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson