Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomakaze
"Pets" ?
May very well be the truth.

But the writer nailed the key phrase, with "Mexican Nationals".
By that single point of fact - these pets are not Citizens of this Nation and, therefore, have NO rights according to the U.S. Constitution.

14 posted on 11/09/2001 9:49:04 AM PST by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Alabama_Wild_Man
RE:are not Citizens of this Nation and, therefore, have NO rights according to the U.S. Constitution.

Correctamundo!

It's telling that the feds have more regard for the "constituional rights" of groups of people who aren't covered by them, yet regulalry wipe their collected *sses as far as the rights of citizens go. (Waco, Ruby Ridge, no knock warrants, gun confiscation, irs, etc, etc). I guess no amount of brutility is too great as long as it's kept "in the family".
15 posted on 11/09/2001 10:16:26 AM PST by tomakaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson