Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wirestripper
I stopped donating to the way in the mid 90s during the scandles involving the leadership

Right, I remember the UW head honcho, William Aramony. Had to resign after it was discovered he was living REAL high on the hog, charging all kinds of expenses to the charity etc.

5 posted on 11/08/2001 6:30:55 PM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: gumbo
FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT RESOLVES WITHHOLDING ISSUES IN ARAMONY CASE

January 2001

Updating a report previously published in this newsletter, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that United Way of America is entitled to withhold federal and state income taxes from certain pension benefits owed to its former president, William Aramony, under a previous court ruling, since $1,872,143 in pension benefits awarded to Aramony in that ruling constituted remuneration for services he performed as an employee. However, the court also found that Aramony was entitled to a reduction in the amount withheld because his taxable income subject to withholding, as a result of the pension benefit payments, should be reduced by an amount of salary previously paid to Aramony that was required to be repaid by him under the prior court ruling.

Other issues presented to the district court involved withholding of taxes on amounts to be paid to Aramony's attorneys by United Way under the prior court decision and the question of whether United Way's obligations to Aramony should be offset by the amount of a judgment previously obtained against Aramony by the New York Attorney General, which, by its terms, was assignable to United Way as an offset against its liabilities to Aramony. The court found that after income taxes were withheld on pension benefits owed to Aramony, less the amount of Aramony's salary to be repaid by him, United Way should pay Aramony's attorney's fees under the prior court decision without further withholding. Additionally, the court found that the judgment obtained by the Attorney General could not be used by United Way to reduce its liability to Aramony in this case because there was no proof that the Attorney General's judgment had been assigned to United Way.

33 posted on 11/13/2001 5:50:27 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson