Skip to comments.
Haunting memories / Oliver North
e-Mail
| Nov 8, 2001
| Unk
Posted on 11/08/2001 5:25:53 AM PST by kAcknor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
I received this email this morning. Its one of those Too Good To Be True items that probably is. However, Im posting it to see if anyone really knows for sure.
1
posted on
11/08/2001 5:25:53 AM PST
by
kAcknor
To: kAcknor
99.9% of all chain emails are bogus. I doubt that this one is any different.
To: kAcknor
It was on Lucianne yesterday. I have yet to see the transcript.
3
posted on
11/08/2001 5:30:01 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
To: kAcknor
The Iran Contra Hearings were in 1987, long before bin Laden started to target the West.
Back then THE big terrorist bogey man was Abu Nidal, whose name was mentioned in the hearings by Oliver North.
To: kAcknor
Yeah, I think this is a little off; the name of the 'terrorist' was Terry Reed, not Osama bin Laden.
5
posted on
11/08/2001 5:33:57 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
To: AppyPappy
This site claims it's a hoax (interesting site in it's own right): http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/rumors.htm">http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/rumors.htm
My guess is that if it were true it would be on Ollie's site, and it's not.
To: kAcknor
'His name is Osama bin Laden.' Watched most of the Oliver North hearings and remember the remarks about the home security installation ... but I'm vague in my recollection as to any mention of Osama bin Laden.
7
posted on
11/08/2001 5:36:05 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: kAcknor
If anyone was in a position to be familiar with OBL back then, it would have Ollie North. This has the ring of truth. I'll be interested to see whether it can be confirmed that he made this statement.
8
posted on
11/08/2001 5:37:47 AM PST
by
Movemout
To: allthingsnew
To: Movemout
Urban Legend, I'm afraid. But it sure made good copy, as an editor would say.
To: kAcknor
11
posted on
11/08/2001 5:40:58 AM PST
by
kAcknor
To: AppyPappy
I predict that this will be posted 10 times on FR between now and Sunday.
To: AppyPappy
I saw it there too. That version was a little less detailed.
13
posted on
11/08/2001 5:47:57 AM PST
by
gumbo
To: kAcknor
Isn't North the guy who spent as much time at the shredder as the klintons did? The guy looked and sounded great in his dress uniform but he still destroyed evidence that could have led to massive corruption.
14
posted on
11/08/2001 5:52:42 AM PST
by
steve50
To: steve50
The guy looked and sounded great in his dress uniform but he still destroyed evidence that could have led to massive corruption.Don't know what you mean by that, but I think he destroyed evidence that, fallen into the hands of the 'Rats in Congress, could have led to the deaths of undercover agents working for us in Central America.
15
posted on
11/08/2001 5:57:25 AM PST
by
gumbo
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: Cyber Liberty
I just spent 25 minutes trying to find the quote cited above. So far I cannot find it but I see that there are numerous references to a half brother of OBL associated with the Iran-Contra affair. This would lead me to believe that Ollie had some acquaintance with the family and may, indeed, have recognized a potential danger. He did buy an expensive alarm system and would not have made that move unless he thought there was a clear and present danger to his family. Ollie does manipulate facts now and again to his own purposes but he is also a Marine whom I tend to trust in general.
17
posted on
11/08/2001 6:01:30 AM PST
by
Movemout
To: steve50
The guy looked and sounded great in his dress uniformBen Franklin said that well done is better than well said. Col. North did both in a way that strengthened America, rather than hurt. There are no similarities between Oliver North and Slick Willy.
18
posted on
11/08/2001 6:01:47 AM PST
by
optiguy
To: Kapali
Wow, it's so great a lot of people in our country have praise for a liar and criminal like North.Welcome to Free Republic Paul Begalla!
19
posted on
11/08/2001 6:04:52 AM PST
by
optiguy
To: gumbo
Part of the story was that the CIA was running drugs out of SA to pay for arming rebels in Central America. If there's any truth to it we will never know now.
20
posted on
11/08/2001 6:05:06 AM PST
by
steve50
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson