Skip to comments.
SHORTWAVE RADIOS GAINING POPULARITY IN U.S. AGAIN
Detroit Free Press ^
| Nov 6, 2001
| MIKE WENDLAND
Posted on 11/06/2001 12:19:54 PM PST by CommiesOut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: jennyp
The cool thing about the synch detector on the 2010 is that it helps when browsing around the dial. I manually advance the dial (in a set range of active freqs.)... and then flip the synch... it will point you right to the exact frequency they're broadcasting at.
If the signal isn't strong, the synch can make it sound worse.
To: Vinnie
It works well, but after finding out that 1 of the tubes is impossible to find or if you can find one it is a fortune, I just let it sit and look pretty."
Yes, the 1L6 usually costs about $30, but they can be found every where and there are numerous work arounds. Look here,
http://www.oselectronics.com/ose_p84.htm
To: John Farson
Evidently it is time to get out the old Hammerlund. I had sort of forgotten about having that. Got alot of good stuff all over on it.
To: John Farson
I've got three or four real cheap SW radios, but I can still get the BBC Caribbean transmissions pretty clearly on 5.975 MHz during the evening hours until 11 p.m. when they change to another frequency. I could probably get that one, too, if I knew what it was.
64
posted on
11/07/2001 8:28:41 PM PST
by
longleaf
To: footstomper
I have a Hammarlund 129-X. Nice when they made stuff here in the good ole USA. Evening time here on the East Coast BBC on 5.975 Mhz good signal. Also Voice of Russia on 7.180 Mhz in english broadcasted from transmitters in Siberia. Great stuff. Moving into the winter time will find low noise on the frequencies. Domestic WBCQ out of Maine 7.415 Mhz they play Jean Sheppard and his radio programs he did on WOR in New York.
65
posted on
11/07/2001 8:44:27 PM PST
by
eternity
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: samtheman
I am KJ6II, advanced class. Kenwood TS940s, into a 2 element tri band quad.
67
posted on
11/07/2001 11:35:55 PM PST
by
Mark17
To: madrussian
Question to short-wave radio enthusiasts: what's the cheapest model that can be used to reliably get stations around the world? Whatever you have, a good outdoor antenna always makes things better.
68
posted on
11/07/2001 11:38:07 PM PST
by
Mark17
To: steveo
Just how many Freepers are Hams?There are a few of us around here. KJ6II
69
posted on
11/07/2001 11:40:39 PM PST
by
Mark17
To: CommiesOut
bump
70
posted on
11/08/2001 12:40:34 AM PST
by
Nogbad
To: eternity
Well sigh- if I keep reading I am going to have to do something about the situation.
To: CommiesOut
Wouldn't you think that anyone who wants to broadcast short wave would also want to stream onto the Internet?
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Wouldn't you think that anyone who wants to broadcast short wave would also want to stream onto the Internet? Not when the power [or the internet] is out..LOL.
[2.5 years too late]
73
posted on
06/20/2004 10:01:41 AM PDT
by
Indie
(Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion; Indie
Wouldn't you think that anyone who wants to broadcast short wave would also want to stream onto the Internet?
It may actually
be cheaper to purchase airtime (yes,
any of these domestic broadcasters like
Alex Jones purchase airtime from WWRB
(Purchasing Airtime On WWRB) and do not own any transmitting facilities) at somewhere around 50 bucks an hour than
directly source streaming audio on the web ... there are other considerations, too, such as shortwave broadcasting,
per se, originating in the USA (on US soil) is intended, per FCC rules and regs in place for shortwave broadcasting, for broadcasting to *other* parts of the world - NOT an audience in the USA ...
This last aspect may, or may not, play into decisions to directly put 'streams' on the internet intended for US listenership (although domestic stations that carry Alex Jones's show may stream themselves).
We all *know* that Alex Jones broadcasts primarily to a US-based audience; I think he (and his broadcaster/transmitting service) is walking a very fine line (if not distinctly OVER that fine line) by purchasing airtime from a broadcaster whose purpose is to broadcast to the world - but carries program content distinctly aimed at a domestic US audience; the bunker-buddy crowd.
I suppose if someone were to 'raise a stink' with a complaint to the FCC about this the broadcaster (the guys who own and lease their 'air time' via their transmitter and license to Alex Jones et al) might get 'cold' feet' and refuse to sell him any more airtime targeted to that US-based audience ...
P.S. Alex Jones is now purchasing airtime from WWCR - perhaps for better coverage, perhaps for other reasons as mentioned above (I don't know; I'm only surmising now).
74
posted on
06/24/2004 7:59:28 AM PDT
by
_Jim
( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson