Posted on 11/03/2001 11:22:25 PM PST by KQQL
Edited on 07/20/2004 11:45:50 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
FReegards...MUD
BTW...if I'm wrong (Heaven forbid) and Warner wins...I hereby predict he SHALL NOT complete his term and SHALL RESIGN due to scandal relating to the way he made his Cell Phone fortune and the connection to Illegal Campaign Funds from the Chi-coms. Therefore, make sure you Vote Katzen as well!!
Bite me, Lefty PUNK...MUD
How much credence do you place in the above statement from the article?
I admire Early's stance to oppose an increase in taxes statewide but it did appear somewhat frivolous of him to draw his line in the sand by saying that the local referendum shouldn't even be placed on the ballot.
It would give the voters of NOVA a chance to decided for themselves if they wished to increase their own local taxes for improvements in road maintenance/mass transit in their area. IMO, it would be beneficial to the rest of the state to allow them to make their own decisions.
Very little...Warner was going to get the NOVA vote anyway because of the Federal BureaucRAT Infestation up there, and Earley was simply using that issue to say he would not raise taxes while Warner most certainly will--er, would were he to get the opportunity.
"I admire Early's stance to oppose an increase in taxes statewide but it did appear somewhat frivolous of him to draw his line in the sand by saying that the local referendum shouldn't even be placed on the ballot."
In reality, it is somewhat frivolous, but Warner's been LYIN' through his Teeth about his supposed Fiscal Conservatism--gimme a friggin' break--and the Medyuh's refused to call him on his BLATANT LIES!! Earley, therefore, went somewhere he knew Warner couldn't copycat him and was, IMHO, successful in differentiating himself from Warner on the issue of Taxes.
"It would give the voters of NOVA a chance to decided for themselves if they wished to increase their own local taxes for improvements in road maintenance/mass transit in their area. IMO, it would be beneficial to the rest of the state to allow them to make their own decisions."
I know, I know...in principle I agree with you, but it is disingenuous fer the DemocRATS to make themselves out to be the DEnizens of Local Control!! Richmond, VA held a referendum that wouldda allowed the City to elect an At-Large Mayor instead of using the present system wherein Councilmen decide who they're gonna call "Mayor." The referendum passed by a 2-to-1 margin then the State DemocRATS overruled it so they could continue to maintain their Corrupt Stranglehold on Local Politics...a CORRUPTION that produced Tim Kaine, BTW!!
FReegards...MUD
How so, General?
MUD
It would give the voters of NOVA a chance to decided for themselves if they wished to increase their own local taxes for improvements in road maintenance/mass transit in their area. IMO, it would be beneficial to the rest of the state to allow them to make their own decisions.
The Times Dispatch has a sidebar with background on the poll and the respondents. It looks pretty normal except for this:
"70 per cent [ of respondents] had no... [ children] living at home"
70 per cent with no children doesn't sound very representative of the electorate to me.
In theory, we are in agreement...but when yer running a Gubernatorial Campaign against a Candidate that will LIE CONSTANTLY and tell you exactly what you want to hear just to get his slimey hands on the Levers of Power, well, I just think Earley had to find a Wedge Issue and this was about all Warner wasn't prepared to say "Me, Too" to.
FReegards...MUD
BTW...I also don't think Earley's numbers took even a little hit in NOVA due to this, and it'll help him State-wide, IMHO.
You know, making that statement while defending Warner just makes you sound like such and incredible buffoon...Your posts are a waste of bandwidth.
Yeah, call it a personal attack if you want, but we've got an election in 48 hours and we don't need this kind of crap from loonies like you.
Mark Warner doesn't give a rat's clymer about Virginia's cultural heritage.
I think that this poll is in the same league with the poll that shows Bret Schundler down by 18%. It's either a poorly conducted poll, a bad sample, or was executed with malicious or partisan intent.
This race is still down to the wire -- and can still go either way. Voter turnout will make all the difference.
GO EARLEY GO!
No, he doesn't. You probably saw post #38 above.
Read my typed word Mud .( W will not campaign for Earley on Monday).
This election will be decided on how Earley does in South West VA !
Earley will win in Shenandoah Valley, Richmonds' Metro, and Southern Va > While Slick will win N.Va and Hamptons.
Exactly!! And neither does the inaptly-named sol2!! He/she/it's a Lefty TROLL!!
FReegards, m2r...MUD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.