Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwrogers
Smallpox "only" has a 30% mortality rate? Or is that the mortality rate for smallpox YEARS AGO?

This is a very good point. We thought inhaled anthrax had a 90% fatality rate, but so far we've seen a better rate of survival.

We have antivirals now, and it will be interesting to see if they can be used.

I got chicken pox at the age of 42 and because of antivirals, I was sick for only 4 days. Years ago, an adult with chicken pox would have been very ill.

Plus, one of the factors of mortality in smallpox is secondary infection, when the blisters break. We have much stronger antibiotics now.

Let's just say this, if smallpox is unleashed on the US, and thus the world, America will handle the outbreak much better than the majority of other countries.

74 posted on 11/03/2001 5:39:29 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: dawn53
Hi Dawn53. You are right: "They" are really surprised that postmodern medical care is curing inhalational anthrax. AND, let us hope & pray that same would occur in the event of weaponized influenza strains, plagues, or smallpox.

But a 30% mortality rate is HUGE. Period.

77 posted on 11/03/2001 5:45:58 PM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: dawn53
"This is a very good point. We thought inhaled anthrax had a 90% fatality rate, but so far we've seen a better rate of survival."

That's attributable to the fact that these patients have been put on state of the art antibiotics AND respirators, from what I understand. In a true anthrax emergency, how many of those respirators do you think are just lying around?

194 posted on 11/04/2001 10:10:51 AM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson