[Burkeman1]

Hmmm- 300 fighters killed? I say we kill 1000 "holy warriors" for every civilian killed at the WTC and the pentagon.

[The Raven]

..I say we kill 1000 "holy warriors" for every civilian killed at the WTC and the pentagon.

The problem is the governments of the countries that either allow people like Saddam to get into power, allow religions to dictate policy, or house terrorists. In other words, the opposite of our Constitution.

Can you remember a US President the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot?

One at a time, starting with Afghansistan....we need to put a few checks & balances in their governments.

[cold_vicious_logic]

I say we kill 1000 "holy warriors" for every civilian killed at the WTC and the pentagon.

That's all?

[Cobra64]

Hmmm- 300 fighters killed? I say we kill 1000 "holy warriors" for every civilian killed at the WTC and the pentagon.

Agreed. I especially like the ratio.

Regards

[FreedomPoster]

Hmm- 300 fighters killed? I say we kill 1000 "holy warriors" for every civilian killed at the WTC and the pentagon.

Apparently the British used to feel similarly when dealing with problems in that part of the world, but they stopped at 100. I am OK with a 1000. I am far past caring if these people "like us". I would much prefer they fear us.

THE GRAVE OF THE HUNDERED HEAD, by Rudyard Kipling

Worth reading, if you're not up on your Kipling. By the way, a Subaltern is a Lieutenant, and Subadar and Jemadar are sepoy officers/sergeants.

[ScholarWarrior]

1000/1 = 5mm. A good start.

[gilor]

YES, I agree, maybe 1000 is a bit conservative how 'bout 10,000 per?