Skip to comments.
Angry judge orders hearing on Olson plea deal
cnn.com ^
| 01 Nov 2001
| Dree Declamecy
Posted on 11/02/2001 11:54:50 AM PST by maxwell
Edited on 04/29/2004 1:59:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: maxwell
Good for the judge. The attorney representing this SLA bitch must be a law partner of Mark Geragos, the sleazoid that represented Susan McDougal. Both defendants sound like they are reading from the same script.
21
posted on
11/02/2001 5:33:58 PM PST
by
agave
To: tjg
"'Alford plea'
Is this used very often? Why would anyone plead guilty if they could just use the Alford plea?
It seems like the result is the same but it might leave your options open. Is there a catch?"
I don't know the answers to your questions, sorry.
22
posted on
11/02/2001 6:18:21 PM PST
by
APBaer
To: maxwell
this is going to get good! the judge is going to ask her to defend her guilty plea and then why she turned around and said she wasn't guilty.
the los angeles times editorialized as usual in its sidebar yesterday, saying that she had no choice to to a climate of "fear and conservativism"!
unbelievable.
23
posted on
11/02/2001 6:24:23 PM PST
by
ken21
To: not-an-ostrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
