[RLK]

The author makes some good points, but negates their impact when he engages in the same thing he's railing against, with this paragraph:

-----------------

No he didn't engage in any such thing. You are just too feeble of cognitive mentality to understand what was said.

[That Poppins Woman]

This is the best you've got? That was it?

What a disappointment you are. I think I'd have gotten a better fight out of Tiny Tim while he was tip-toeing through the tulips.

[philman_36]

No he didn't engage in any such thing.

I'm not feeble in cognitive mentality in understanding that you should have used "I" in that statement.
No, I didn't engage in any such thing.
Just seems kind of strange to be talking about yourself that way since you say you wrote the article. You talk in the third person instead of the first person when talking about the author.
Or do you normally talk about yourself that way?
Don't bother replying "Robert", strictly rhetorical.