To: rob777
The crusades were NOT something worth defending. Yes they were. In principle. But the sack of Constantinople was indefensible.
To: Aquinasfan
"Yes they were. In principle. But the sack of Constantinople was indefensible."
Agreed, IN PRINCIPLE, the Crusades were a defensive reaction. It is the actual practice that I have a problem with.
60 posted on
11/06/2001 10:21:43 AM PST by
rob777
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson