More than that, it's right on the money. The terrorists broke men's laws specifically because they saw a higher calling in God's law. Your World War II example is a red herring.
But they also violated God's law against the murder of innocents. Sounds as if they were chasing some interpretation, much as some of the pro-homo cheerleaders will attempt to quibble over the definition of "man" and "woman."
The rescuers of the Holocaust and the Pro-Life movement in the nation are prime examples of how God's Law must prevail.
So, if you are so dedicated to the law of men, why are you against the votes having a voice in this law?
Wrong. The terrorists did not break their laws when they committed their acts. They broke our laws, but not necessarily those of their state(s). God's law (according to the Bible) clearly states "Thou shalt not kill." Therefore, to break the law of our nation and commit such a crime, is to also break God's law.
The World War II example devastates your argument, therefore you falsely claim it to be a "red herring." You do so because you cannot refute it.