Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks
How much do you know about this subject?

Or are you just stating your own blind ignorant views.

By the way, I used the noun ,hermaphodite, because it is the noun with the closest meaning to discribe a child born with sexual characteristics of both male and female genitalia.

103 posted on 11/02/2001 6:10:53 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Paul C. Jesup
How much do you know about this subject? Or are you just stating your own blind ignorant views.

Enough to know your “transsex” agenda and that it doesn’t have anything to do with intersexuality. Nice denial though, I especially like the one about, “The standard is surgery to give them female genitalia”, Pure blind ignorant crap!

109 posted on 11/02/2001 9:41:36 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Paul C. Jesup
By the way, I used the noun ,hermaphodite, because it is the noun with the closest meaning to discribe a child born with sexual characteristics of both male and female genitalia.

Wrong again, genitalia characteristics are either male, female or ambiguous. A hermaphrodite means having functioning reproductive organs in plants and microorganisms and has nothing to do with humans. You’re generalizing a great multitude of syndromes into one neat little package to promote your transsexual agenda.

115 posted on 11/02/2001 12:19:20 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson