Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's Unchristian Beginnings?
It Stands To Reason ^ | Gregory Koukl

Posted on 10/31/2001 5:45:53 PM PST by Khepera

Greg responds to an L.A. Times Op-Ed article by this title (sans question mark), subtitled "Founding Fathers: Despite preachings of our pious Right, most were deists who rejected the divinity of Jesus."

There has been a lot of confusion on the issue of whether or not we' re a Christian nation, and I'm not exactly sure why. But it is hotly debated in our culture right now. The reason I say I'm not sure why is because the historical record is quite clear. I think that Christians, though, often make inappropriate, unfounded, or inaccurate applications of some of the information, and I want to speak to that in just a moment. As to the faith content of those who were our Founding Fathers, there can be absolutely no confusion about the fact that virtually every single one of them shared a Christian, biblical world view. There is some question as to whether every single one of them held to all the orthodox teachings of classical Christianity; but it seems to me that there is very little question as to what their religious persuasions and world views were.

There was a piece in the L.A. Times on the third of this August on the Op-Ed page entitled "America's Unchristian Beginnings." It is subtitled "Founding Fathers: Despite preachings of our pious Right, most were deists who rejected the divinity of Jesus." There are a couple things that trouble me about this article, the biggest thing is the word "most" in the subtitle. "Most of our Founding Fathers" apparently were deists, according to this person's assessment. This is a canard that's been tossed around even by some Christians who ought to know better. This piece was written by Steven Morris who is a professor of physics at L.A. Harbor College and he is also a member of the L.A.-based Atheists United.

Some might say, what does a physicist know about history? Just because he is a physicist doesn't mean that he can't have an accurate opinion about this particular issue. I take issue with his research. It' s simply bad.

He goes on to reply to the Christian Right, who he says is trying to rewrite the history of the United States in its campaign to force its view of religion on others. His approach is to quote seven different people: Thomas Paine, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Ethan Allen, James Madison, and Ben Franklin. His point is to quote these individuals who he thinks apparently are, first of all, Founding Fathers, and secondly, characteristic of the lot of them in rejection of Christianity and in acceptance of deism.

I am frustrated by this because it is characteristic of the way a lot of people want to treat this issue. They think that they can take names that we associate with that period and are well known, sift through their writings and find some things that they think are hostile to Christianity, and therefore conclude that not only these people are anti-Christian, but all of the rest of them are anti-Christian, as well.

It's an example of Steven Morris turning the exception into the rule. Since he can find what he thinks are seven different people that are important personalities during this period of time, who at some time in their lives may have written something that can be understood to be non-Christian, then that characterizes the whole group of them as deists, ergo the subtitle "Most were deists who rejected the divinity of Jesus."

Morris' sightings are simply specious. Thomas Payne and Ethan Allen, for example, were in no- wise intellectual architects of the Constitution. Rather, they were firebrands of the Revolution. Was that important? Sure, they made an important contribution, but they weren't Founding Fathers. Period.

Now, as for Washington, Sam Adams, Jefferson, and Madison. If one looks at the literature of the time--the personal correspondence, the public statements, the biographies--he will find that this literature is replete with quotations by these people contrary to those that Mr. Morris very carefully selected for us. Apparently, he also very carefully ignored other important thinkers: John Witherspoon, for example, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, John Adams, Patrick Henry. All individuals who were significant contributors to the architectural framework of this country and who had political philosophies that were deeply influenced by Christianity, especially Calvinism.

But there is another thing that he completely overlooks in this analysis. Something that makes a mockery out of his analysis, and also answers the question quite simply and directly and in the affirmative for us about the Christian beginnings of our Republic.

This issue is actually very simple. The phrase "Founding Fathers" is a proper noun. In other words, Founding Fathers refers directly to a very specific group of people (although I think you could be a little bit flexible and include a little wider group of people). Those who intellectually contributed to the Constitutional convention were the Founding Fathers. If we want to know whether our Founding Fathers were Christian or deists, one needs only to look at the individual religious convictions of those 55 delegates of the Constitutional convention.

How would we know that? We look at their church membership primarily, and also at their correspondence. Back then church membership was a big deal. In other words, to be a member of a church back then, it wasn't just a matter of sitting in the pew or attending once in a while. This was a time when church membership entailed a sworn public confession of biblical faith, adherence, and acknowledgment of the doctrines of that particular church.

Of those 55 Founding Fathers, we know what their sworn public confessions were. Twenty-eight were Episcopalians, eight were Presbyterians, seven were Congregationalists, two were Lutheran, two were Dutch Reformed, two were Methodist, two were Roman Catholic, one is unknown, and only three were deists --Williamson, Wilson, and Franklin.

To heap more fuel on the fire of my point, of the 55, the Episcopalians, the Presbyterians, the Congregationalists, and the Dutch Reformed (which make up 45 of the 55) were Calvinists, for goodness sake! In other words, these weren't just Christians, these were among the most extreme and doctrinally strict Christians around. Of the 55 delegates, virtually all of them were deeply committed Christians. Only three were deists. Even Franklin is equivocal because, though not an orthodox Christian, Franklin seems to have abandoned his deism early in life and moved back towards his Puritan roots. Indeed, it was 81 year old Franklin's emotional call to humble prayer on June 28, 1787, that was actually the turning point for a hopelessly stalled Constitutional convention. We have his appeal on record thanks to James Madison who took copious notes of the whole proceeding. His appeal contained no less than four direct quotations from Scripture. This does not sound like a man who was hostile to the Christian religion.

But this assessment doesn' t answer a more fundamental question: Are we a Christian nation? It seems clear that most of the Founders were Christians, not deists. But what about the question "Are we a Christian nation?" I think the answer depends entirely on what is meant by "Christian nation."

Are the theological doctrines of the Bible explicitly woven into the fabric of government? The answer is no. The non-establishment clause of the First Amendment absolutely prohibits such a thing. However, was the Biblical view of the world--the existence of God who active in human history, the authority of the Scripture, the inherent sinfulness of man, the existence of absolute objective morality, and God-given transcendent rights--was that the philosophic foundation of the Constitution? The answer is, without question, yes. The American community presumed a common set of values which were principally biblical. Further, the founding principles of the Republic were clearly informed by biblical truth.

A question can be asked at this point. Given the fact that most of the Founding Fathers--either those who are among the 55 delegates to the Constitutional convention or those outside of that number who were significant architects to the Constitution--were in fact biblical Christians and had sworn to that, and those that weren't were at least deeply moved and informed by a biblical moral view, one could ask the question, "So what? What does that have to do with anything today?"

I think that Christians may be a little out of line on this part of the issue, and I want to bring it into balance. Regarding the question, Is America a Christian nation?, if we mean by that that Christianity is the official, doctrinal religion of this country, the answer is of course not. That's prohibited by the exclusion clause of the First Amendment. If we mean that we were founded on Biblical principles by Christian men who had a deep commitment to the Scriptures by and large, the answer is certainly yes.

But then the question is, So what? How does what happened 200 years ago influence what is going on now? I actually have two points to make.

This fact doesn' t give Christians a trump card in the debate on public policy, in my view. Just because Christians were here first doesn't mean that their views should continue to prevail. Within the limits of the Constitution, the majority rules. That's the way this government works, ladies and gentlemen.

But let's not rewrite history to relegate those with religious convictions to the sidelines. That is the other half of this. The privilege of citizenship remains the same for all despite their religious convictions. Everyone gets a voice and everyone gets a vote. Christians don't have a leg up on everyone else because we were here first. Even the Christians who wrote the rules didn't give us that liberty. They didn't give us that leg up. They made the playing ground even for everyone, every ideology, every point of view.

Having said that, though, in writing the First Amendment and the non-establishment clause, they did not have in view this current idea of separation--that the state is thoroughly secular and not informed at all by religious values, especially Christian. This view that is popular now was completely foreign, not just to the Founders, but to the first 150 years of American political thought. It's absolutely clear that the Fathers did not try to excise every vestige of Christian religion, Christian thought, and Christian values from all facets of public life. In fact, they were friendly to religion in general, and to Christianity in particular, and encouraged its education and expression.

As to the durability of this tradition, I suggest that anyone who has any doubts about this simply read Lincoln's second inaugural address, which is etched into the marble of the northern wall of the Lincoln Memorial. Go there and read it. Face Lincoln, turn right, and there it is. It contains no less than three or four biblical references.

After that you can reflect on Lincoln's Thanksgiving Proclamation of October 3, 1863. It begins this way: "It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God, to confess their sins and transgressions [By golly, how did that get in there?] in humble sorrow, yet with assured hope that genuine repentance will lead to mercy and pardon. And to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations are blessed whose God is the Lord."

I think that pretty much settles it.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial

1 posted on 10/31/2001 5:45:53 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Khepera
bump (to read later)
2 posted on 10/31/2001 5:51:35 PM PST by cantfindagoodscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Good Post.
3 posted on 10/31/2001 5:54:27 PM PST by Deanna Knapp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
4 posted on 10/31/2001 5:54:28 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Here's a question: Can a nation be Christian? What does being a Christian nation mean? Does the Lord judge us collectively by what nation we belong to? If as individuals we are saved if we believe in the Lord, what is the parrallel for a nation? Will men who have accpeted the Lord be judged negatively if their nation is not Christian? Conversely, will men who have not accpeted the Lord by judged positively if their nation is Christian?
5 posted on 10/31/2001 5:55:24 PM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Manny Festo
And what significance do you put into the data you present?
7 posted on 10/31/2001 6:02:43 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Good one. BUMP
8 posted on 10/31/2001 6:04:29 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Manny Festo
I am always doing something, I see you brother.
11 posted on 10/31/2001 6:12:41 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Manny Festo
Your home page is great. Thanks. Regards,
12 posted on 10/31/2001 6:13:54 PM PST by AMERIKA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
13 posted on 10/31/2001 6:15:55 PM PST by VRW Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
...most were deists who rejected the divinity of Jesus.

I do not believe that is true. Yes, they were "Deists" but other than their uniform belief in God they were somewhat undecided on many points (that goes only for some of them, mind you).

I know that Jefferson was a "pious" man but not necessarily convinced of Christianity. (The same, in fact, was true of Mr. Lincoln).

But these people most certainly believed in a Creator.

14 posted on 10/31/2001 6:19:18 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay; Khepera
I know that Jefferson was a "pious" man but not necessarily convinced of Christianity.

You are right. But also remember that one of the books Jefferson wrote was "The Words of Jesus." [I have a copy.] It was simply a collection of the words of Jesus, the "red letter" verses. And Jefferson, as a school board member, included this book in the required reading list for the public school students in Virginia.

I think today they call that being a "religious right wackos."

15 posted on 10/31/2001 6:31:13 PM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
I don't care what you believe in as long as you understand that we have to believe in a higher ideal than the condition of man.

If we believe that man is it, then the only rights we are granted are those of man (no rights).

Our inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are granted by God.

Those who would take these rights away have God in their cross-hairs and, that's why our religions are under attack.

Whatever our founders believed makes absolutely no difference to our supreme law, our Constitution.

Here's a good one:

"...Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;..."

Now, if they can't pass any law about religion or its practice, then how can anyone say something violates the separation of church and state? That would be a law wouldn't you say?

Hit your knees in the oval office and carve the ten commandments in the floor if that's what you want to do and tell the feckless heterodock socialist garbage to go pound sand.

NO means NO.

16 posted on 10/31/2001 7:23:17 PM PST by conway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
But let's not rewrite history to relegate those with religious convictions to the sidelines.

This type of revisionism has even crept up through the events of the 1960's. Don't forget that school prayer and Bible readings were still an unremarkable feature of everyday life at that time. I refer in particular to the dramatic Christmas eve reading of Genesis 1 from Apollo 8 in lunar orbit. In the recent "20th Century" series on the History Channel they gave a brief description of Apollo 8, but any mention of this reading was conspicuously absent, even though it was the signature event of the mission. I guess they didn't HAVE to mention it, but I thought it amounted to censorship. ( The reading is fully documented at the site, Apollo 8 Christmas reading BTW )

17 posted on 10/31/2001 8:22:55 PM PST by Doctor Lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Christian_list

I get asked all the time: “How do I get on this bump list?” Well the answer is you can’t! The FreeRepublic Master Bump List is not a list of people who get notified about a topic appearing on FreeRepublic but it is a list of topics that you can click on and have posts relevant to those topics displayed to you. There are many topics like “WOD_list” (War On Drugs) or “Homeschool_list” (Stories that Homeschoolers may be interested in) or “Homosexual Agenda” (A list of articles related to that topic). And they all appear on the The FreeRepublic Bump List

When you are reading an article you can add it to the list by posting a reply to that topic and in the “TO” box put the name of the list you want it to appear on preceded by an “*”. For example if you want the article to appear on the War on Drugs list then put “*WOD_list” in the “TO:” box instead of someones screen name. You can also put it on several lists by separating the list names with a simi-colon “;”. Then when you want to see the list go to The FreeRepublic Master Bump List and click on the link for that list.

18 posted on 11/09/2001 11:42:50 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson