Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B52 carpet bombing 'can oust Taliban'
The Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 11/01/2001 | Alan Philps and Michael Smith

Posted on 10/31/2001 4:00:53 PM PST by Pokey78

AMERICA intensified its attacks on Taliban front-line positions yesterday, launching the first raids by giant B52 bombers north of Kabul.

A payload of bombs from a B52 blots out Taliban positions on Tutakhan Hill, north of Kabul

The appearance of B52s cheered anti-Taliban commanders, who have spent the past week deriding American "pin pricks", and raised their hopes that the enemy positions might at last collapse. As a B52 barrelled across the sky, its four vapour trails clearly visible, the whole landscape appeared to shake.

It sent down one salvo of bombs, setting off a series of at least 15 explosions over a distance of half a mile, before returning for a second attack. Previous air raids on the strategic sector of the Taliban front line guarding the approaches to Kabul have been carried out by smaller fighter-bombers which release one or two bombs at a time.

The attacks continued throughout the day, and commanders said that it was the most intense since America began bombing the front line on Oct 17. "This is the most successful day so far," said Alou Zeki, commander of a sector of the front to the west of the Soviet-built Bagram air base. "If it continues like this, the front line will collapse and the Taliban can be defeated."

The intensified bombing was apparently in response to criticism from congressmen that America was not making enough use of its military clout. The B52 Stratofortress was used in the bombing of Cambodia, to destroy Iraq's Republican Guard during the Gulf war and against Yugoslav troops in Kosovo.

It was used against Taliban and al-Qa'eda bases in the early part of the campaign, but until now has not attacked Taliban front-line troops. The Pentagon indicated that additional US forces would move into Central Asia over the next few weeks from where they could attack targets in northern Afghanistan.

Several thousand troops, including Green Berets, have been in southern Uzbekistan for some weeks. Independent observers in northern Afghanistan have said that US F-15 Strike Eagle aircraft attacking Taliban front lines have flown off towards Uzbekistan.

The admission that more assets would be moved into the former Soviet republic came after a visit by Gen Tommy Franks, commander-in-chief of US Central Command, who is running the US campaign. US defence sources in the Uzbek capital, Tashkent, said a number of countries were providing "concrete, solid assistance to the war on terrorism" but were not prepared to acknowledge this publicly.

Charles Heyman, editor of Jane's World Armies, said the movement of further assets to Uzbekistan came amid signs that the Americans were preparing to set up a forward operations base in northern Afghanistan as a prelude to a ground invasion in the spring.

Yesterday's raids have long been sought by the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance to make up for their weakness in men, materiel and strategic location, as the Taliban control high ground on the approaches to Kabul. Northern Alliance officials have said repeatedly that three days of carpet bombing of the front lines would open the way to the capital.

But Alou Zeki was careful not to say when the march on the capital might begin. "I am glad they are bombing the troop concentrations, where there are no civilians to be killed," he said. "This is really weakening the Taliban." After the B52 raid, the whole front line - which can be silent for days - burst into life, with exchanges of mortar and machine gun fire.

There was a new buzz in the bazaars of the opposition territory that the phoney war might be drawing to a close. The streets seemed more warlike as soldiers adopted winter camouflage. There were reports that Russia was providing armour to boost the Northern Alliance's inventory. But no tanks have been seen crossing the icy pass through the Hindu Kush.

There has been great disappointment on the opposition side - and equal relief among the Taliban - that the American front-line raids have so far been relatively restrained. Reports from Taliban-controlled areas suggest that the militia are constantly on the move to avoid being hit.

Anti-Taliban commanders say they see signs of the enemy creeping back to their bases at night. But the air campaign has yet to deliver a blow that would persuade the Taliban that the balance of forces has turned against them.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: oef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Russ7
Here you go Russ...


61 posted on 10/31/2001 6:08:54 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I am new to Free Republic and have to admit I am completely addicted to this site. It is so refreshing to get to read the TRUTH - it has really changed by opinion on many, many issues. Keep up the GREAT work.
62 posted on 10/31/2001 6:10:04 PM PST by Eyes Now Opened
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
The intensified bombing was apparently in response to criticism from congressmen that America was not making enough use of its military clout

"I think this is so, and it brings up the question:"

Monday Morning Quarterbacking by Congressmen or whining by the press almost certainly had nothing to do with it. It comes under the heading of logical next step in a progression designed to collapse the Taliban on itself, with a little help from the Afghans themselves.

Do you honestly believe that Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney give a damn what John McCain, Bill Kristol or Chris Shays might, or might not, think? That is, if they think at all...

63 posted on 10/31/2001 6:14:02 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Is it possible that X42 left us with no ammo? 6 bombs here, 13 there, another 12 over there. I want to see scores of mushroom clouds like the other day. Not 1, but a dizzying array of them.
64 posted on 10/31/2001 6:14:56 PM PST by E-2K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Amazing to think that after 47 years, the B-52 is still an Air Force workhorse.
65 posted on 10/31/2001 6:16:36 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HP8753
You can gas 'em...
66 posted on 10/31/2001 6:21:07 PM PST by clee1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"Do you honestly believe that Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney give a damn what John McCain, Bill Kristol or Chris Shays might, or might not, think?"

Yes, the Administration wants the American people's support, and one element
that helps mold that support is the daily wailing of the CongressCritters,

67 posted on 10/31/2001 6:26:30 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
BOY!----I HOPE we're right in our assumptions!

Otherwise, "You & I" will be "eating Crow" for a LONG time---& EVERYTHING we believe our Nation "Stands For" will---ONCE AGAIN---Have to be "Won" by the Blood of "Patriots!"

We HAVE TO hold the unimaginably precious legacy our "Founding Fathers" bequeathed to us!

We OWE THEM----NOW & FOREVER!

Doc

68 posted on 10/31/2001 6:33:35 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
"Yes, the Administration wants the American people's support, and one element that helps mold that support is the daily wailing of the CongressCritters,"

The Bush administration enjoys near-unanimous support from the American people, without having to accommodate the self-absorbed wailings of these particular CongressCritters.

69 posted on 10/31/2001 6:35:34 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: E-2K
I just want 20 C-130's loaded with Big Blu's making a pass on the Taliban front lines for the media...Just to remind Sadamn of what his future entails and the Somalians of what their miserable rathole of a nation will soon look like.
70 posted on 10/31/2001 6:37:18 PM PST by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
No amount of bombing is going to bring the Taliban to submission as there were few targets of military value to begin with.The air campaign did not clinch the Gulf War, that fray was only won when American ground forces enetered the action. Only a massive invasion of Afghanastan will do the trick, and although I pray that I am wrong, I do not think the American public will accept a prolonged, high casualty ground action. History repeats itself and the US all too often fails to heed the lessons of its past mistakes.
71 posted on 10/31/2001 6:37:33 PM PST by buckalfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Inspiring!
72 posted on 10/31/2001 6:37:58 PM PST by jedi150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"The Bush administration enjoys near-unanimous support from the American people, without having to accommodate the self-absorbed wailings of these particular CongressCritters."

Bush, jr probably remembers the "near unanimous support from the American people" that his Dad enjoyed, which support quickly waned to the extent that a 3rd rate governor of a 4th rate state could beat him for re-election.

73 posted on 10/31/2001 6:49:18 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
Could you also tell how to get a picture into url format? I know there is a site it can be posted to and then linked to, but I can't remember what the site is. Thanks!
74 posted on 10/31/2001 6:51:36 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Not sure about how effective bombing will ultimately be in mountainous Afghanistan. But the Philippine Muslim terrorists could certainly be dispatched . . . and their island "cleansed" with such. And they ARE part of Bin Laden's network--no doubt.

Let her roll?

75 posted on 10/31/2001 6:51:40 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa
No amount of bombing is going to bring the Taliban to submission as there were few targets of military value to begin with

I think you are right, but I think we are following a similar strategy as in the Gulf War, in spite of all the speculation. That is pound them repeatedly with air strikes 24/7, remove any infrastructure, reduce their will to resist and then and only then bring in the ground troops. Although Afghanistan is a somewhat different situation, I really think the military is working a plan here and too many people are over anxious to put the ground troops in. They need patience - this isn't a video game. Those soldiers who will be coming home in body bags if we send them in too soon are real people.

76 posted on 10/31/2001 6:52:54 PM PST by CalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
"Bush, jr probably remembers the "near unanimous support from the American people" that his Dad enjoyed, which support quickly waned to the extent that a 3rd rate governor of a 4th rate state could beat him for re-election."

Of that, I've no doubt. Which is why he'll fight this war to win. Which means ignoring the gratuitous tactical suggestions coming from the political peanut gallery.

77 posted on 10/31/2001 7:07:48 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
It's an elegant design, like the 1911 handgun - everything you need, nothing you don't need!
78 posted on 10/31/2001 7:10:37 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Anyone else remember how the B-52 won Vietnam for Washington?
79 posted on 10/31/2001 7:15:45 PM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Yep. Linebacker I and Linebacker II.
80 posted on 10/31/2001 7:16:35 PM PST by ImaGraftedBranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson