Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chimera
Not much of a target since its been decommissioned and dismantled now for years.

There is a working nuclear reactor at Shippingport.

7 posted on 10/31/2001 9:18:14 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
There is a working nuclear reactor at Shippingport.

Beaver Valley Units 1&2 list Shippingport, PA, as their mailing address and nearest metropolitan area (such as it is). Is this what the article refers to? If so, it should use the correct name of the plant.

The original Shippingport Nuclear Plant was taken out of service and dismantled years ago. But, I guess I shouldn't assume that the press would print accurate information...

13 posted on 10/31/2001 9:36:14 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
There is a working power plant at Shippingsport.

Correct. There are 2 operating nuclear plants at that site. Beaver Valley 1&2.

I don't know if I understand the rationale at all for making restricted airspace for 10 miles around and 18,000 feet below every nuke plant. This affects small general aviation only. If someone tried to crash one of these planes into any nuclear containment structure in the country, they'd just sweep it off. I guess the only rationale I can think of is that they want to keep the airspace clear so they can more easily look for a commercial jet off course. I know nothing about air traffic control and don't know if this ban would help.

We have approximately 60 operating nuclear sites around the country, mostly in rural areas. I feel for all the private pilots that are stranded at these small airfields...and there's a lot.

14 posted on 10/31/2001 9:38:40 AM PST by Chick-with-a-brain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson