Why are there no denials?
Because, General Illbay, they ain't gonna tell you or me anything that might be of use to the enemy.
This isn't some obscure publication.
Gads. You are ignorant and proud of it. I'll repeat it slower, because you don't seem to get it.
It. Is. One. Media. Source. With. A. Clear. Bias.
Presumably. One. Media. Source. Will. Repeat. A. Party. Line. More. Than. Once.
I hereby predict that the following will occur: In a few days, the telegraph.co.uk will repeat this Party Line Mantra, and you will go absolutely creamy all over again, jumping up and down and going 'See? See? See? There it is again!!!'
Go back and check, in answer to questions in this regard, Rumsfeld simply said "we were surprised at the strength of their resistance" and wouldn't elaborate.
There, let me repeat the operative phrase: and wouldn't elaborate.
Once again, since you have to be the most dense individual I have dealt with: and wouldn't elaborate.
You may not reasonably draw inferences from his lack of elaboration, and his "surprise" could be anything from "They have nukes and America left the region for good" to "We expected they were all dead, and were surprised to see one corpse weakly raise his mangled arm."
You just don't know, but you act like you do. And you base your baseless conjecture on one heavily-biased media source.....
-- and when it repeats itself, you try to pass it off as two sources.
But I cold-busted you, and I think that is the true source of your frustration. Debate point goes to Laz, and Little Lord Fauntelroy cannot have that, can you?
That's the basis of your firm conviction? You have great faith for one who is an atheist.