Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
The problem with that is that the south didn't want an army the size of the Federal Army in 1860. They passed legislation authorizing an army of 100,000. Your $16 million just became $80 million. And the army of 1860 wasn't starting from scratch, the confederate army was.

Value of total Southern exports in 1859 was $208 million, bringing in a like valued import amount at an 8% tariff, and what do you have?

You have the end of your claims to a free trade zone, among other things.

307 posted on 11/08/2001 12:56:13 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Free trade can be interpreted somewhat loosely; it need not mean no tariff, but rather a moderate tariff consistent with the costs of the importing nation in maintaining ports, etc - i.e. a reasonable user fee. The Northern tariffs were far greater than the 8-10% range which the South contemplated.
308 posted on 11/08/2001 1:20:16 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
Two things here regarding your straw-man assertions. We are talking Southern economy, based on war or peace? You asked about how the South would run its economy.

Well you decided on a war economy. That would be entirely based on credit. The data I gave you was for a peace time economy. Second, apparently you don't do any reading, or you would have seen the tariff rate that was legislated.

315 posted on 11/09/2001 7:14:29 AM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson