Assuming that you are referring to Juilliard v. Greenman, then I suppose that if I point out that Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution refers to powers prohibited the States and has nothing to do with this issue you will just fly off the handle again? Or if I point out that Article 1, Section 8 gives Congress the power to coin money and to regulate it's value, and it places no requirement on what that money is made of then my good friend PeaRidge will accuse me of bashing again or engaging in conclusional blather?
Hey there, Pea. What kept you?