Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snorkeler
There is an upside to giving names -- the same one there is to full disclosure of any action by a government -- it breeds trust in the citizenry in their government; a government that appears to have nothing to hide is a government more readily trusted.

As for allowing the release of the CO's last name, it's just common sense. The CO's name appears on just about anything associated with the unit in question (welcome aboard brochure's, autographed pictures, official web sites, etc.), so attempting to hide it at this point would be an exercise in futility and make the government look like total morons (closing the barn door after the horses have escaped, and all that).

The folks on these threads berate the government for its coverups (some legitimate, some just CYA), and in the next breath demand that the government maintain secrecy on stuff that's been in the public domain for years.

44 posted on 11/02/2001 7:49:14 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
By that logic, the names of all spies should be made public as well?
46 posted on 11/03/2001 10:55:22 AM PST by snorkeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson