To: alpowolf
It sounds as though you want the govt to use force against those you consider "deviants". A frightening thought, since I suspect that your definition of "deviant" would include most of the population.This has got to be as big a reach on a small part of a post taken out of context as I have ever seen. Wherever you came up with this is a mystery to me (or more accurately a machination of yours to protect your own ways). Hit home, did I?
It looks like my post defined the several on here that I thought it would. The howling has certainly gotten started now and has greatly intensified, has it not?
It is not MY TRUTH - and it is certainly NOT YOURS!
107 posted on
10/29/2001 9:53:40 AM PST by
Will
To: Will
OK. If I'm wrong, then you tell me: how do you define "deviancy"? What do you want done about it?
I keep hearing over and over that our "tolerance" of sin "caused" the attack--or, excuse me, God "permitted" it on account of these sins, or tolerance, or whatever. (To me, the difference between saying "God caused it" and "God permitted it" is mere hairsplitting). What do you want done about this?
Since 9/11 I have been trying--in vain--to get a straight answer to these questions. The more you evade, the more suspicious I get. I will consider your suggestions of what we should do, if you ever get around to telling me what they are.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson