Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diogenesis
It was earmarked for purposes other than the donors wanted.

Its suppose to be distributed according to the organizations priorities. Donors are not to dictate how the ARC's money is to be spent. Again, liberals go by intent, conservatives go by the law, or in this case, the policy and programs that are and have been established by the ARC. Got it?

36 posted on 10/26/2001 9:44:20 PM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: VA Advogado
"Donors are not to dictate how the ARC's money is to be spent."

If this NOTION were correct then the agencies would not require a Judge to reapportion.

Why do you appear to support such systematic stealing?

38 posted on 10/26/2001 9:48:50 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: VA Advogado
Its suppose to be distributed according to the organizations priorities. Donors are not to dictate how the ARC's money is to be spent.

Well, EXCUUUSSSE me but when we donated to the American Red Cross it was specifically to the September 11th relief effort; not for some international fund. My young son even donated $5 to help the 9-11 victims and their families and the fact that NOW they say they are going to spend it some other way gets me soooooo p.o'ed that I'm thinking about finding a way to get my and my sons money back (and give it to the NYFD). I can't believe this, what a crock.

76 posted on 10/26/2001 10:31:16 PM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson