Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drag Queen Fake-Nuns May Lose Tax Exempt Status (How did they get it in the 1st place?)
Catholic League ^

Posted on 10/26/2001 2:52:28 PM PDT by Notwithstanding

October 25, 2001

IRS ASKED TO REVOKE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF SISTERS OF PERPETUAL INDULGENCE

The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights has petitioned the Internal Revenue Service to revoke the tax-exempt status of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. The league’s position is that the Sisters have long been in violation of the law that allows non-profits a tax-exempt status.

Catholic League president William Donohue commented on this development today:

“The Catholic League has legally acquired documents filed by the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence with the IRS that nominally commit the Sisters to certain legitimate goals. The problem is not what the group proclaims to be doing—fundraising and education—but what it spends most of its time doing, namely Catholic bashing. It is ludicrous on the face of it for the Sisters to maintain that one of the major issues they address is ‘the role of religion in daily life.’ How? By simulating sodomy while dressed as nuns, using a gas pump as a phallic symbol?

“Suffice it to say that we have compiled evidence of the group’s flagrantly anti-Catholic and patently indecent activities. Hence our decision to appeal to the IRS to strip the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence of its tax-exempt status.

“If a group of white anti-black bigots dressed up as Al Jolson and mocked African Americans, no one would excuse them because a small part of what they do is to contribute a pittance to selective charities. If a group of anti-Semites were to dress as Shylock and mock Jews, no one would excuse them because a small part of what they do is to contribute a pittance to selective charities. Similarly, we do not expect anyone—including the IRS—to excuse the Catholic-bashing the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence engage in because a small part of what they do is to contribute a pittance to AIDS-related charities.

“The evidence we have amassed is thorough and persuasive. The time has come for the government to stop the public funding of bigotry under the guise of charitable giving.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2001 2:52:28 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: patent
Catholic bump
2 posted on 10/26/2001 3:01:10 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Looking at that particular group, and you really gotta' wonder why some people thought Jerry Falwell was in error.
3 posted on 10/26/2001 3:01:55 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I am not a Catholic, but I am a straight male Christian San Franciscan. If the CL is able to pull this off, I can't wait to hear the whining from the S.F. Board of Stupes -- especially Mark Leno, who once tried to sic the IRS on the Mormons because the published an official document regarding defense-of-marriage measures.
4 posted on 10/26/2001 3:03:26 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Surely this group doesn't turn a profit! LOL

So they must be a non-profit. ¿Right?

5 posted on 10/26/2001 3:04:16 PM PDT by DrunkenDotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Even white supremacists engaged in the "education" of others about their views would be entitled to tax exempt status.

Offensive, but legal. I don't want the government deciding which group's ideas are acceptable, and which are not.

I support firearms education charity, which has a tax deductible status. I would like to keep it that way (until the income tax is repealed.)

6 posted on 10/26/2001 3:06:43 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Episcopalian Bump!

When I read something like this, I want to hurl something!

7 posted on 10/26/2001 3:06:59 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; *Catholic_list
LOL, these people are a charity? What can't get charitable status?

patent

8 posted on 10/26/2001 3:38:30 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patent
Conservative groups can't get charitable status.
9 posted on 10/26/2001 4:56:18 PM PDT by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I agree with you.
10 posted on 10/26/2001 5:51:02 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You are very discerning and I was thinking the same thing. The media bashed Jerry Falwell for weeks, this type of group will barely get a mention in the press. And so most Americans will think the Reverend is the bad guy and the Fake-Nuns are just a Halloween stunt. Beam me up...
11 posted on 10/26/2001 8:21:04 PM PDT by Faithfull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
They are such maroons out here. A friend of mine called information (411) about 'Perpetual Adoration' and was given the number of this group of bigots. She had never heard of them, boy, was she shocked.
12 posted on 10/26/2001 8:27:30 PM PDT by pbear8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faithfull
Oh but see you can have drag queen fake nuns, you can have acceptance of Islam, but when you bring up the fact that this was originally a Christian nation, and what the Bible says happens when nations continually sin, it's time to be quiet because you can't have Christianity cutting into anyone's fun or it's not the right time, always some excuse

Falwell was right and the Bible is not some old dusty outdated book that needs to be thrown out because we don't all like what it says.

As for these fruits dressed up as nuns, they should not only have their status revoked they should have to pay back every red cent they gained from being exempt

13 posted on 10/26/2001 8:29:12 PM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Offensive, but legal.

BS. This is a social club, whose hobby is acting out their self-validation. Their impudent expectation is that we'd like to subsidise this willful suppression of residual guilt through non-therapeutic recreation. Pass.

14 posted on 10/26/2001 8:44:52 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DrunkenDotter
DrunkenDotter member since October 26th, 2001
 

Welcome to Free Republic. I have this uncanny ability to spot left-wing newcomers, Drunk. Next, I'll be running a search on all of your posts, to see what not-so-subtle ridicule for conservative common sense you've posted on our other threads.

Hahahaha! TV as babysitter! Whatever happened to parents' taking responsibility for the influences on their children? Let's blame Ellen for the fact that we're too lazy to pay attention to information sources which mold our children's minds from early youth! It's all big, bad, lesbian Ellen's fault! -- DrunkenDotter

The preceding was posted in response to the fact that the Human Rights Campaign, one of the organizations that are shoving the homosexual agenda down the throats of our children, has bought advertising time during the Saturday morning cartoons. Apparently brainwashing our kids while they're in public school isn't good enough.

Now then, regarding the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. There is a certain white supremacist named Matt Hale, who has been trying to provide legitimacy to his racial hate speech for years by claiming tax-exempt status as the World Church of the Creator. Make no mistake about it, this is the Klan. The Illinois Attorney General's Office is on him like white on rice about the tax-exempt status and I could not be happier about it.

The test appears to be whether the primary purpose of the alleged non-profit is to promote a religious or philanthropic agenda, or to promote some other kind of agenda. Obviously, both the World Church of the Creator and the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence fall into the latter category. Freedom of speech and all that, but I don't have to subsidize it by paying their share of the tax burden.

15 posted on 10/27/2001 10:03:53 AM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
See preceding post for the legal test regarding tax-exempt status.
16 posted on 10/27/2001 10:05:51 AM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bryan
You're so cute.

You did realize that I was joking, didn't you? I didn't seriously mean to defend the "nuns'" organization as a "church" or other tax-exempt non-profit organization.

(By the standard I was describing, maybe Amazon.com should be tax-exempt, because it doesn't turn a profit, either!)

Okay, maybe the "joke" wasn't terribly funny. Butt it was meant as a joke.

17 posted on 10/27/2001 10:12:34 AM PDT by DrunkenDotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib; NotTheDevil; Manny Festo; erizona; Clint N. Suhks; George W. Bush
FYI...
18 posted on 10/31/2001 8:22:05 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
These habitual pervs are going global. Check out their Global Domination page. They're even in Iowa. IOWA!!!

To get a real eyeful of nuns with slitted habits and beards, you can check out:

www.thesisters.org
www.lasisters.org (Los Angeles)
19 posted on 10/31/2001 9:23:07 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; Notwithstanding; Grampa Dave; Faithfull; billbears; muawiyah; FormerLib...
(Yuk) Bump!

7 posted on 10/26/01 3:06 PM Pacific by Grampa Dave:

"When I read something like this, I want to hurl something!

This will make you hurl -- get your puke bucket and Meet the "Sisters"

20 posted on 10/31/2001 10:00:02 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson