Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pipe Dog
"We were able to eliminate or severely limit the most egregious violations of Americans' civil liberties that were contained in the original proposal," Barr said after the vote."

Anyone know what that was?

"At a Cato Institute event Tuesday afternoon, Barr had taken a far more critical approach: "The philosophy underlying the legislation remains problematic.... There are a number of troubling provisions in this latest draft."

OK..so you take out 'the most egregious violations of Americans' civil liberties' and do nothing about the other stuff and that changes the 'philosophy of legislation?

"The worries expressed by some groups that are members of the new In Defense of Freedom coalition include: the ease with which police could eavesdrop on the Internet, expanded information-sharing between police, the CIA and similar agencies, and potentially intrusive surveillance of users by their Internet providers."

This makes me ask myself: Why have I sat for hours reading, emailing, calling, sending letters and protesting to stop this?

48 posted on 10/26/2001 11:51:08 AM PDT by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Native American Female Vet
"Why have I sat for hours reading, emailing, calling, sending letters and protesting to stop this?"

Now, you know that our congresscritters could not open their mail (anthrax), look at their email (the building was closed) or get any negative feedback from the people.

This was the perfect opportunity to destroy the freedoms of the citizens while claiming that they never heard any objection.

152 posted on 10/27/2001 7:34:18 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson