Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomB
Given this roller coaster, the resistant bug is given a better chance to grow, and eventually becomes the main pathogen.

Except we have no reports of anyone being infected by someone who is on antibiotics. It is highly unlikely that any of us will be infected by someone who contracts anthrax and additionally all those exposed so far had first hand exposure from the letters. How do you explain resistance unless the anthrax was previously exposed it to anti-biotics ?

118 posted on 10/25/2001 9:25:53 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Except we have no reports of anyone being infected by someone who is on antibiotics. It is highly unlikely that any of us will be infected by someone who contracts anthrax and additionally all those exposed so far had first hand exposure from the letters. How do you explain resistance unless the anthrax was previously exposed it to anti-biotics ?

Will you relax?!

If you reread my post, it was in response to a general question about how organisms develop an tolerance to antibiotics, we weren't discussing anthrax. However, now that you mention it, naturally occurring bacteria, because of the ubiquitousness of penicillin, are known to develop resistance on their own. If the fact that the anthrax being investigated is beginning to show a resistance to penicillin is true, it would argue that the strain began as a naturally ocurring bug. Although that is not near to being conclusive.

121 posted on 10/26/2001 4:28:38 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson