Posted on 10/25/2001 7:20:19 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
Some Aspects of Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons:
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0797/em2.htm
HERF High Energy Radio Frequency Page:
http://www.codexdatasystems.com/herf.html
HAARP Home Page:
http://server5550.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/haarpIndex.html
Noise:
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/fishattorney/sub.html
Many people that have been hearing a very high pitched sound,
since the early 90's, and similar to that of an old black and white TV,
have been diagnosed with a "new type of tinnitus". The sound
however, makes people ill, with shoulder and neck aches, and
a feeling of disarray; confusion, headaches and lethargic feelings.
Doctors fail to do proper testing that would indicate that the sound
is quite real, and that of low radio frequency harmonics that are
extending into the human hearing spectrum. Instead they prescribe
pills.
Interesting, huh?
Of course, not, you will have to ask Dan Rather "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"
I carry a ball-bat under the front seat just for that purpose.
I found the noise of it bouncing off the roof of the offending
vehicle usually quiets it quite rapidly.
I definitely want on that customer list!
The weapons discussed put out electromagnetic pulses (EMP)of such strength that they fry electrical circuits.
The military was rightly concerned for years that a nuclear explosion puts out such a high level of EMP that it would fry circuits for hundreds of miles (in the case of a high altitude air blast of the nuke).
In order to protect against the EMP disabling military systems, specific measures were used and the military would test the system using an antenna array outputting EMP that would simulate the EMP from a nuke. Thus, their simulators would likely share some common characteristics with these new Ruskie weapons. Also, they likely could test vulnerability to the new Russian weapons.
The U.S. Navy tested its ships (and those of allies) by using the EMPRESS systems.
However, these structures, that likely cost millions to build, have been dismantled. A certain impeached former president insisted on dismantling because it would show the Ruskies that we were disarming. This was against the express advice of his then Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Colin Powell, who said we could mothball the structures at little or no cost in case we needed them later. But no, TRIM-X-POTUS insisted that DOD spend big bucks to dismantle them.
Summarizing, and considering that other services EMP testing systems were also dismantled, mothballed or reduced, TRIM-X-POTUS' treasonous actions have left us much more vulnerable to this type of weapon or at least with greatly reduced capacity to test for vulnerability.
You can shield the weapon with a Farday cage, but then how do you communicate with it? If its a smart set and forget weapon (e. g., with an optical targeting system) shielding ought to work. But if you have to radio guide it, shielding keeps out your radio signal. I'm speaking as an electrical engineer, not as anyone with any weapons knowledge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.