Well, I agree with the thrust of your argument, and the specifics of the MCA. I definitely see where your opinion is valid. You don't see where mine is--and that's perfectly acceptable. That's as it SHOULD be. My opinion of what should have happened is risky; your's is prudent. Your conviction is deeply felt; mine is not--it's just the perspective from my observation point. But that IS the appearance to me. I surely stirred up the hornet's nest with that, didn't I?
BTW the way, I like your screen name. When they talk about Congressional gridlock, I say great. That's what the country needs for about 50 years. (IMHO)
I changed over to this screen name in honor of the Jeffords defection. I agree with Will Rogers that the people are never safe when the Legislature is in session. Gridlock is the next best thing to permanent adjournment, IMHO.