Skip to comments.
McVeigh Cites Osama Bin Laden in Letter to Fox News-April 27, 2001
Fox News ^
| Friday, April 27, 2001 1:41 a.m. EDT
| Fox
Posted on 10/24/2001 10:08:32 PM PDT by Sunshine55
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: giotto
No, they're not at all in that drawing.
Do you know anything about this? They say John Doe #2 is Michael Brescia. Here is a link but it is a bad photo.
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6784/unwanted.htm
(Sorry I haven't tried posting links.)
To: giotto
Here is another one!
To: giotto
To: bonesmccoy
http://www.cnn.com/US/9703/09/bomb.third.man/sketch.t1.jpg
Link someone make work. Remember he would be years younger, so this is very possible.
To: onyx
...or a side shot of Atta would be nice.
To: BushCountry
Interesting sidebar, quote from cnn website, All three versions of those John Doe No. 2 sketches have been publicly withdrawn, though the witnesses at the Ryder office maintain they did see an unknown second man.
To: TheHound
...and an Arab nose, the composit doesn't.Nobody has a nose like that composite. What, is he part elf?
Wonder if it was ever changed to look more Republican.
27
posted on
10/24/2001 11:30:29 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: BushCountry
I think this is what you want to do. One thing I want to point out here is that your mind and eye will play tricks on you. If you are convinced that the drawing and the photo are the same person, you'll pick it. We're only presenting the photos together (and not in a line-up). So, there is more likelihood that we are making a mistake/error from bias.
When you posted that link, I looked at it. I thought it didn't match Atta because of his hair line. So, I figured that I could go looking at the photos of the other whackos from the DOJ page. Here's the coincidence that I saw.
The photos on the right are from the DOJ's website.http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/ua175/175.htm
To: BushCountry
Your image, for some reason, did not load. I'll try posting it without the HTML image attributes:
That didn't work either. Strange. Does CNN block links from Free Republic?
Anyway, here's the link to the image:
"CNN's version of the FBI sketch"
29
posted on
10/24/2001 11:35:43 PM PDT
by
giotto
To: bonesmccoy
By the way, your eye will draw conclusions where there may not be. So, although the comparison are a bit strong, I'm not going to totally jump on this bandwagon. The side-by-sides are very thought provoking, aren't they?
To: Nick Danger; Ms. AntiFeminazi
Freaking amazing, isn't it?
To: bonesmccoy
Good work, dude. Atta is the most square-jawed of the bunch. And he might have been less gaunt, and had a lower hair line back then. It would be worthwhile checking on the locations of the various people in custody and on the most-wanted lists. bin Laden DID mention EXPICITLY and attack on the "heart" or "heartland."
32
posted on
10/25/2001 4:55:36 AM PDT
by
eno_
To: Nick Danger
Hey, way to go! I've been looking for this comparison for some time now! Thank you!
To: TheHound
Atta has a projecting chin and an Arab nose, the composit doesn't. The eyebrows and hairline are dead-on. A composite is a best-fit from memory. The fact that even some of the features match that well would be quite a coincidence.
To: bonesmccoy
But Atta has virtually no bottom lip. The sketch is of a man whose bottom lip almost looks like it's been pumped up with silicon.
And the guy in the sketch looks like he's got a broken nose, the bridge is really wide and looks kind of squashed. Atta's nose is straight.
To: Madame Dufarge
I'm just gonna bump this thread I tripped over.
bttt
To: Nick Danger
How about posting a front view of JD2, and a side shot of Atta, in addition to the two shots? Comparing two different angles like that is basically worthless...
38
posted on
05/13/2002 2:36:21 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Nick Danger
Oh, s*it!
And the war continues...
39
posted on
05/13/2002 2:37:04 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: Poohbah
How about posting a front view of JD2, and a side shot of Atta, in addition to the two shots? Comparing two different angles like that is basically worthless... Lemme get this straight. Several months ago, I went out on the web and collected a mug shot of Mohammad Atta and a composite sketch of John Doe 2. I pasted them into a side-by-side picture and posted it in this thread.
And now you are here today to tell me that you are dissatisfied with the available mug shot of Atta, and the composite sketch of JD2, and you want me to somehow produce or find another Atta photo (after Atta himself has been turned into burned-up disassembled molecules) and another composite sketch from a different angle. What are you, the armchair director who dispatches minions to collect pictures for you to examine? Go to Google and try to find the damned things yourself. That's what everybody else has to do.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson